|
2001-2002 Notes:
AWC
Briefing | Robert Hunter | Christopher
Meyer | Andy Mack | Larry Korb |
2000 Notes: AWC
Briefing
Air War College PANEL BRIEFING
14 May 2002, "Global Hot spots".
India & Pakistan by Amit Gupta,
Visiting Professor.
Arab and Israel by Christopher Hemmer,
Assoc. Prof. of International Security.
Russia by Mary Hampton, Assoc. Prof.
Political Science, University of Utah.
Raw notes.
Stephen Fought, moderator
Great power approach, or contending theories -- AWC takes regional
studies approach., has worked out well since end of cold war.
Christopher Hammer middle east
Ex Colgate & Cornell, psych & arab-israeli conflict.
War on terror in Jordan -- 2nd closest to US in region, intell valued
by US in saving US lives. but Jordan works quietly, between Iraq &
a hard place. Jordan surrounded by more powerful states and dependent
on Iraqi oil, chain of Iraqi oil tankers on road. 60% of pop is palestinian
not Jordanian. Govt. pro US but not pop
Israelis used to terror, and suffered multiple WTC attacks in proportion
to pop. Israelis have little strategy v terror -- going in to destroy
what they can, and return in 5 yrs to do the same. Tactics overwhelm
strategy. Since Oslo 183, leadership on both sides has failed to
lead pop into acceptance of reality. Complete mixture now of settlements,
West bank checkpoints humiliating for palestinians. Arafat has not
prepared people for acceptance of any deal. -- need to accept partial solution.
PA is corrupt. Now both sides in crisis management, no long term
thinking. US intervention not the answer -- sides would just blame
the US instead of developing peace agreement. Now in death spiral
-- but violence is not yet so costly as to drive them to peace..
Mary Hampton, Kosovo
Europe security specialist, and esp changes in russia. BUsh administration
saw Russia as marginal player -- and is still a work in progress
and Rns viewed this with resentment -- coupled with domestic problems for
Putin, still trying to consolidate his position. Rn mil esp offended
but since Sep 11 watershed, détente III: Putin had pushed anti-terrorism
before this because of Chechnya problem. Large Muslim pops and insurgencies
in "Near abroad". Russia nato council now, acknowledges shared interests
with Russia, Russian intell useful in afghan, and central asia. Putin
has consolidated power, 3 yrs of growth, can now pay the military, can
collect taxes, attacking mafia leaders. Positive story. Russian
military would not meet with AWC group, though, because of resentment.
Putin uses undemocratic methods, so question whether democracy will last
five years, after Putin. Last year Russians brought up China all
the time, but now ignores China , western centric foreign policy and lacks
strategy for Asia. Oil mostly in Siberia and far east,
where increased Chinese immigration, will be problem in future and Russia
now dependent on oil, largest supplier to Germany.
Gupta, India. 800K troops massed on India Pakistan border,
and both nuclear armed. India will be IT giant. GLobalization
not all good, trade doesn't make nations more democratic, do not share
same values. India does respect dem and rules of international system.
Islamic insurgency in Kashmir, plus high altitude battlefield in north
Kashmir. . RUnway at 11000' feeds troops at 20000' at
cost of $1M per day. Indirect artillery duels; and 90% of casualties
are from avalanches. Insurgents attacked Indian parliament,
died but provoked India into sending entire army into the border.
Both sides have nuclear delivery systems, missiles, bombers, India two
subs. Both have good record of not transferring weapons to others,
esp India. Risk of terrorism lower than other places, because
both sides separate bombs from launchers. They use movement as diplomatic
signal. In summer snow melts and troops can move vs terrorists, but
hostilities not likely till Sept. because of extreme heat in desert.
Question Time:
Hemmer: US welcomed in Afghan but Israel not welcomed in west
bank by any Palestinian group. Syrian threat is of sponsoring terrorism
but not capable of attacking directly; northern Golan heights is still
a flash point. Danger is that Syrians have only huge chemical weapons
program to strike back at Israel -- Conventional forces not strong.
Gupta -- Indians still ahve problem with unions, foreign competition,
standard car still 1954 Morris Oxford, a monopoly. About 40M Indians
live like n fr
6M Indians live like France, mass still poor.
Hemmer: failure of leadership on Isareaeli side, few Israelis
support settlements -- but in 120 seat Knesset, 30 parties and current
PM only has a few seats. For settlement, PM must uproot settlements
but will destroy any governing party.
Hampton -- US needed Russians intell recently, has changed relations.
Putin westernizer, spent career in KGB in Germany w/ perfect language,
oil dependency growing of Germany on Russia, Putin from st. Petersburg
(western). Will russians join EU? Russians not sure and
EU against. 80K pages of requirements and Russia far behind on dem,
markets, civil military relations.
Membership in EU is Combination of issues and interests. Fissures
in US, EU relations as always, but will constrain US leadership in war
on terror.
Duma increasingly pro nationalist and pro communists.
Indian has electoral fraud and economic backwardness; problems in Kashmir.
In Islamic insurgent countries, governments have left no avenue of disagreement
except in Mosques.
Draft: raw notes
Amb. Robert Hunter, "American Foreign
Policy: What Next?"
Tues 16 April, 2002.
Currently Senior Advisor to RAND corp; US ambassador to NATO, 1993-98,
architect of new NATO and Partnership for Peace, formerly VP at Center
for Strategic and International Studies; Senior foreign policy adviser
to Gov. Clinton, VP Mondale, Sen. E. Kennedy, Rep. Gephardt; has over 700
publications.
AWac 4/16/02 Amb. Robt Hunter
Former amb to NATO
Alistair Buchan pointed to dates 1776 & 1941 as Amer character --
but Sep 11 equal in imp.
62 nationalities in 9/11 -- Brits lost more than all in Irish terrorism.
Saw quality of Amer troops in Bosnia.
1991 coalitin of 41 countries, mostly not needed militarily but for
poiltical regins, to give lie to Saddam's propaganda.
It was necessary to send a message to terrorists that they & supporters
wold pay a price.
Reestablished credibility of US -- others have got it wrong in Japan,
Korea & Iraq.
Cold War end was most collosal strategic retreat in histry, by USSR.
US incipient power mil pol, economic & cult. US mil outspends
all, incl. allies -- US increase this yr exceeds entire Brit mil budget.
More imp than collaps of Rome.
Few threats to homeland, no attention span in US after cold war.
US contain, confound comm & lead global economic -- total focus
of cold war. Now paradigm gap! Waht will replace this in US fon pol..
Most rapid engaget of country in international trade in history except
meiji Japan.
Nap said do anything with bayonet except sit on it.
Use mil power in interests & values, incl. Glf War -- but even
there Sen reluctant. Kosovo had no strategic value except protecting
rep of NATO -- but dominant consideration was limiting casualties -- and
there none kiled in action.
NAFTA, WTO, NATO.
NATO raatifies US as Europe power..
unprecented alliance.
Abolishes war between major powers for first time.
Merging E Europ into west, bringing them back into
Now when there is knock in ingiht, it is just that the house is burining
down.
Partnership for peace soon to be succeeded by council of 20.
NATO force confronting Russia was turned 120 degrees to face Balkans.
Will NATO get involve in Russia today or in weapons of mass dstruction?
Homeland secrity needs to avoid destroying civil libs -- goal of asymmetrrical
warfare. Psych effect stupendoous - more than actual deaths on 9/11.
Axis of Evil term emphasizes WMD, in short term Iraq. IIn 1991
if Iraq had WMD, we would have paid a higher price.
Need new international financial instn.
War on terror was to exclude IRA and ETA.
Initial response was to avid war by ctee -- but now administration
realizes needs allies. Even after win, become resp fr defeated
pop eg in Afghan. Europe allies se it differently -- sees enemies
having middle eastern pop suppoort.
Bush 43 has been talking (eg in Monterrey, Mex) of alliances and need
to earn spport in midle east.
Moral nterest n Isreael. Colin Powell trying to return to US
braoder interests from Israeli peace agreet -- but but any negotiated setttlet
will involve US peace keepers.
Need strategic partnership with EU, because have resources.
Enogh is enough -- need project for 20 yrs as in Europe post WW2.
Need us public opinioni behind it.
Question Time:
Adlai: my job to talk & yours to listen. If you finish before
me, free to leave.
Camp David II was too late.
US is nly potential leader capable of underwriting peac agreets.
Clnton was too late in starting, BUsh also. Too many staff &
pres papers are removed upon changeover -- eg in 1981, Iran hostage papers
were sent to Atlanta.
Agreet in Eypt 2001 contains the obvious peace plan but not picked
up by Bush.
Right of return f refugees more imp to Israelis than is Jerusalem,
common with Palestinians.
Barak never actually extended offers -- and too much was lost between
changovers n US and Israeli regimes.
Saddam has little to do with Al Qaeda.
His WMd are more sgnif coz dominate the Gulf.
Why end to Glf war? 1- highway of death. 2-commanders said nothing
more militarily to do. 3-allowed Saddam to slaughter Kurds to protct
Turkey.
Have missed oppys to deal with Iran when Hajemi offers we riase the
bar before dealing. Better to deal & build relationship to prevent
Iraq getting WMD.
Still need halt to Arab Israeli fighting.
Need comprehensive non prolif regime from soup to nuts. Nunn
Lugar bill of Rn nonprofi program has been cut back . Destructin
of Iraqi reactor ini 1981 as good. Little chance f Pelstinians getting
Bmb is low but states can. Only case of transferring nuke RA-Chi
Draft: raw notes
Sir Chris Meyer, on the changing nature
of diplomacy,
March 5, 2002
At Bologna with Nathan
Seventeenth century : 1604 in Germany, Sir Henry Wooten: "an ambassador
is an honest man sent to lie abroad for the good of his country."
James I then fired Sir Henry, whose mistress was James's daughter, Queen
of Bohemia.
Diplomacy has changed in 3 ways.
Blurred line between foreign and domestic policy.
Politics & economics blurred.
Foreign policy (what is done) and diplomacy (how done) have been dragged
into limelight.
Contrast with subtle signals of old. Metternich: on death of
Russian ambassador, "what did he mean by that?"
Now age of CNN, ambassador discuss minor policy matters publicly.
440 staff in DC embassy and only few from diplomatic service -- experts
on many types of policy.
New diplomacy requires new flavor in Wash.
Job: Pundit, saloon keeper, lobbyist
14,000 guests in embassy per year.
Atlee: visited US 1946, reported Democrats like Rubs were like Cons
party.
With Al Capone: don't get the idea I'm knocking the American system.
Pursuing British national interest is different when in US -- 9/10
times working for common goals with US.
"War on Terror has made intimacy of relationship more intense than
at any time in my career."
Thesis: Britain has been in permanent revolution since
1979 Thatcher, transformed country for better, bipartisan now under Blair.
Reversed decades of economic decline. Deregulation, privatization,
flexible labor market, conversion of Bank of England into Federal Reserve
with independent rights of interest rates setting; devolution to Scottish
& Welsh, and (god willing) Northern Ireland.
Tourism $4bn to see castles etc.
New cutting edge though -- modernization is watchword, e.g. fiber optics,
info tech second only to US, also bio science sector.
Huge British economic success: lowest inflation and unemployment
for a generation, long term interest rates, growth greatest in G7.
American investor: US business surging vote of confidence more than
Asia or in major continentals, almost as much as in Latin Am.
British investment to AL $2.5Bn; to US, largest.
Difficult & contentious relationship with continent under
Conservatives but improved under Labour.
(Ethnic Joke: Brit poll: vision of heaven & hell.
Mark Twain: a German joke is no laughing matter.)
Does European link weaken special relationship? Absolutely not!
Gen. De Gaulle offered choice of Europe or America. But there
is not a choice -- more we lead in Europe, better allied partner to USA,
& vice versa.
Is cornerstone of Brit foreign policy today.
New Labour: old virtues of free trade, NATO, stand firm for
liberty, democracy, values of US.
Blair spoke a few days later, "we are with you from the beginning and
will stay with you till end" true come hell or high water.
18th Century -- 1775 Edmund Burke sympathetic to US colonists, "strong
as iron, light as air" ties across Atlantic.
Question Time:
US may impose 30% tariff on Brit steel -- UK deeply unhappy.
Europe currency: support in principle, burt not yet convinced.
5 economics tests before adoption, working through them now. Polling
shows most Brits skeptical center at present, w/15% on each side..
2-3 years before Referendum.
Nationbuilding: British army skills of operating in civilian
area have proven valuable in Bosnia & Afghan.
Afghan -- agreed must build Afghan army but must find means,
while Kabul foreign force must send units out to countryside to some degree.
US is learning to stay in Balkans for nation building regardless of
US short term culture.
Fight & exit without civilian reconstruction is not that neat --
life obliges change of attitude.
Fox hunting banned in Scot, but free vote in HoC and may be
delayed in Lords.
British v European support for US.? Doctrine of mutually
assured schizophrenia. When US leads, European complains -- but
also when US doesn't lead. US tells European to get act together,
give one phone No. for crisis -- then when create one European platoon,
complains of lack of consultation.
US as only superpower, must lead, & accept others complaints
-- like UK in 19th Century -- but not too significant. French &
German Special Forces are in Afghan.
Flexible labor market? Thatcher whacked Trade Unions >> flexible
labor mkt. Significant loss of members of Trade Unions. US
business investors approve.
Brit established embassy in Iran, critical engagement w/ Iran,
supporting moderate forces. US did not pursue same policy.
But in 2002 Brit policy under threat -- Iranians rejected new ambassador.
Policy rebuffed.
Axis of Evil? Nexus of terrorists , states harboring, &
weapons of mass destruction -- huge challenge. (prefers not "axis"
term.)
Bush: N. Korea, Iran & Iraq.
Different policies toward Iraq (imp) Iran & N. Korea -- Brit does
not treat as axis.
royal family in robust health & will survive for ever.
European good at working together against terror cells. Years
of open door policy allowed cells to grow. Single arrest warrant
gets over problems of extradition. e.g. warrant in Italy , arrest
in britain.
Missile defense causes less anxiety than in Clinton's 2nd administration,
increased under Bush that it would destroy panoply of arms control, wedge
between European and US. But Bush consultations close including w/
Rns and lesser issue. Bush-Putin diplomacy has defused issue, calmed
europeans.
May 2002 St. Petersburg summit, given difficult tech and long development
time, may settle issue for long-term .
N. Ireland -- CLinton & Mitchell moved peace process along;
Bush appointed ambassador rich Haas to continue. Outsiders incl.
Brit govt. can only do so much, but in better situation than ever.
[Standing ovation.]
|
|
Prof. Andy Mack, Speech on Countering
Islamic Terrorism, 9 Oct. 2001.
Thanks to a record large group of Public & World Affairs Club students
(at least 11) who attended the World Affairs Council tonight; I am
confident everyone found it valuable.
Prof. Andy Mack, now visiting at Harvard following several years as
a deputy to Kofi Annan, the United Nations Secretary General, and a long
standing academic expert on security issues, argued for a two pronged policy
against terrorism.
Of course, he argued, the US must remove the current leadership of the
Al Qaeda organization. But it must also prevent the base from renewing
its leadership, by removing the conditions of poverty and oppressive governments
that breed young radical followers, antagonism to the US and would-be martyrs.
Economic development seems to lead to political development and eventually
the authoritarian regimes become less repressive, taking away much of the
stimulus to terrorism.
The US has a very low and declining rate of donating foreign aid, yet
this is less expensive than coping with the outbreaks of terrorism or (much
worse) genocide and civil strife around the world. The nation state
is still the primary actor in world affairs, and places limits on the United
Nations. [So much for Sam Huntington's thesis that the clash of civilizations
is replacing the clash of nation states.]
Nonetheless, the US should pay its UN dues, and the UN perhaps needs
a Rapid Reaction Force able to prevent disturbances escalating until fuller
forces can be raised (typically with a three month lag, and subject always
to national calculations of self interest.)
Prof. Mack illustrated his points with many examples from his multiple
careers around the world, including Rwanda, Srbrenicia, East Timor and
Iraq. His previous careers have included RAF pilot, Antarctic base
administrator, visiting professor at various universities, and author of
books and articles.
-- Jeremy L.
Air War College PANEL BRIEFING
2 May 2000
John Albert Phd history Oxford, not Yugo specialist. but 4 yrs NATO.
Aviano being expanded w/ NATO $ as control base for Balkans. Perhaps
other failed states to come.
Ethnic hatred thesis is not cause of violence -- only when permitted
by governments.
De-mining still going on by hand.
Based in Split. Top officer left Fed forces in fear for lives -- did
not have to make difficult choice of patria.
Matt Rowe, German specialist, taught at Luther College.
Slovakia & Poland trip.
NATO EXPANSION TOUR.
P most imp in EE for NATO owing to size & dem support. Has ex-comt
ldr now. Country still below potential but rgcovering.
Slovakia needed tractors to pull fighters because poor. Still vendettas
of thuggish leader to critical MPs & jts. Albright: critical of Slovakia
sliding away from NATO.
New reform PM now elected.
Buck Grinter (Asia)
Phd UNC
VISITED S.KOREA & JAPAN
Japan most imp after UK : essential store for material for defense
of Asia. But changing US interest -- 10 yrs of economic & pol
stagnation, no breakthrough in sight, serious if not critical.
S.Korea in 40 yrs has gone from $800 to $14000 pc income -- but stll
subject to artillery barrage.
Kim Dae Jung now engaging w/ N.
But Taiwan has to work w/corrupt regime & engage w/China in endless
talks.
Question Time:
Croatia assisted by contractors to beat Serbs but since war has had little
aid from EU, & CSCE has 54 countries cannot decide -- makes NATO
look efft!
Slovenia wants NATO but lacks force. Is land bridge between Italy &
Hungary -- but cant be admitted w/out Romania.
|