Issue 1A: New Orleans (read three articles, and present one)
Issue 2A: Bush Administration's Rhetoric on Iraq war [Agenda] [Map] "How Bush Plans to Repackage the Iraq War". Time Joe Klein, "What Bush Should Have Said" Time [Twillia]
by Twillia Fontenot, Fall 2006
* In the past 5 years, I have made mistakes and miscalculations against Islamic extremism due to anger and impatience from Sept 11th
* The campaign against the Islamic extremists is going to be long-term
* Stability is our goal for the Middle East and the mere act of holding an election does not make a country a democracy
* We should have remained patient in 2002 when the UN inspection on Saddam Hussein was being preformed and we would have acknowledged then that Saddam did not have weapons of mass destruction. This revelation would have destroyed the dictator’s creditability
* Instead we rushed to war without insufficient preparation and allies
* Iraq must build a new coalition that does not include a radical Shi’ite government
* We must stay in Iraq to continue to help them build a government with secular political parties, but we must stay smarter. Withdrawing now would have terrible implications
* In the US we must build a alternative energy strategy that is not dependant on foreign oil
* We are sending 30,000 troops to Baghdad to help stabilize the troubled city and should reassess our military posture if the Iraq government does not become stable in the new future
* Theories about changing the world does not fix the situation, we must take action now
Niall Ferguson: "The Nation That Fell to Earth" Time Fareed Zakaria, "Why Iran is no Nazi Germany." Newsweek
Della Baker, Fall 2006
* Involved in 4th World War
* America’s defense outlay more than 100 times Iran’s
* Estimate Iran would need 5 to 10 years to achieve nuclear capacity
* Washington paints all enemies as crazy – gross exaggeration
* Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad enjoying media attention and goading United States
* Bush administration giving him more attention than he deserves
* Nuclear issue gives Ahmadinejad a great nationalist symbol and national accomplishment
* Iran destabilizes important part of world and causes problems for Israel
* The United States is more powerful than Iran
* More than 40% of populations is below the poverty lineRichard Wolffe and Holly Bailey, "The Islamofascists" [on Bush administration's rhetoric]Newsweek [Rodger]
by Rodger Armstrong, Fall 2006
The authors of this article are trying to show how the White House is trying to come up with the perfect term that defines who is the enemy in the war on terror. With the elections just weeks away, the White House is trying to use a strategy that worked well in the past, of reminding the voters of 9/11 and accuse the Democrats of being weak in the face of the enemy. Trying to make the complex seem simple on issues like national security and the growing war is proving to be frustrating. One of President Bush’s senior aides said that it can be very confusing when trying to explain who we are fighting and what we are up against. With the uncertainty over how to sell the war, it’s showing how the administrations’ team is becoming disjointed when talking about it. The GOP strategists are working to get their message under control and unify the party.
1. What to call the enemy
* Islamism – that the US is fighting a entire religion
* Jihadism - it’s a positive word for many Muslims, does not evoke bloodshed
* Islamofascism – buzzword, catchy and tied neatly in the presidents historical view of the struggle
2. CIA, Pentagon, and the State Department
* Nixed the idea of a single phrase for a war that is so complex
* There is no perfect word
* No mater what you call it, the ideology is different for the religion of Islam
3. 5 years after 9/11, the President is still searching for the perfect phase to:
* define who the enemy is and reassure the American people
* remind voters of 9/11 and use the strategy of simplifying the complex
4. To make the complex seem simple
· War on terror has many fronts
o British airline plots
o Lebanese militias
o Iranian nukes
o Brewing civil war in Iraq
Question: By lumping together the disparate groups into one; is President Bush helping the jihadists, instead of exploiting the differences between the Sunnis and Shiites, Arabs and non-Arabs?Paul Bedard, "'Security moms' still on board, Republicans say," US News David E. Kaplan, "Iraqi public opinion: bad news and good," US News, 8/17/2006
by Cheryl Roy, Fall 2006
- Violence and chaos of Iraq have taken toll on the people according to a study of Iraqi public opinion
- Two surveys of over 2,300 Iraqis in 2004 and 2006 found feelings of powerlessness, insecurity, xenophobia and pessimism and distrust of U.S. intentions.
- Rise in support for secular politics and nationalism.
- Insecurity affected all three of Iraq’s major ethnic and religious groups.
- Iraqi’s who“strongly agreed” that life is “unpredictable and dangerous” :
- 48% of Shiites up from 41%
- 79% Sunnis up from 67%
- 50% Kurds up from 16%
- 90% of Iraqis would rather not have Americans or British as neighbors
- 61% preferred to not have Iranians or Jordanians living next door and 71% hoped to avoid Turkish neighbors
- According to survey the three main reasons Iraqis chose for the U.S. invasion:
76% to control Iraqi oil
41% to build military bases
32% to help Isarel
<2% to bring democracy to Iraq- Good news in the study-Iraqi attitudes is moving more toward support for secular politics and nationalism instead of for a religious regime.
- Iraqis agreeing that it is very good to have Islamic government where religious leaders have absolute power declines from 30% to 22%, Sunnis support drop from 20% to 6%.
- Sunnis fear majority Shiites will impose an Iran-like theocracy. Shiites support dropped from 39% to 34%
- Increases in Iraqi Nationalism and support democracy supporting “democratic rule making” from 59% to 65%
Damien Cave, "Troops Cut Death, but Not Fear, in Baghdad Zone," NY Times[Kim T]
By Kimberly Tarver, Fall 2006
A. Death in Baghdad Zone* Dora, the deadliest neighborhoodB. American Soldiers offer security
* Constant fighting between Sunni and Shiite
* Death tools have soared up more than 50 percent
* 334 people have been found dead in Baghdad from August 24 to August 31.* Reinforced military presenceC. Relinquishing control to the Iraqi security forces
* Building relationships between the citizens and the security forces
* Gaining the trust of the Iraqi citizens
* Working with the Iraqi police to establish joint controls
* Maintaining control of the once war zoned streets
* Eliminating roadside bombings* Iraqi officials enlisted a new national police brigade
* Differentiating friend from foe
* Persuading the militia to disarm
* Maintaining a peaceful area after the American soldiers have moved on.Recommended: Special Report, "Air Power: An Enduring Illusion," Economist, 20 Aug - 1 Sep '06, pp.20-21 [seek via HC library's EBSCO Host or InfoTrak databases; or read via email in hardcopy]. Meanwhile, Afghan war heats up [Map]: Carlotta Gall, "New Assault Takes Big Toll on Taliban, NATO Says," [includes map] NY Times AP, "US Planes Mistakenly Kill Canadian in Afghanistan," NY Times Articles not discussed 31 Aug. "Bomb, Clashes Kill at Least 50 in Iraq" US News "At Least 23 Dead in Iraq Violence" [front page, to register] Wash Post "Shiite Militia Clashes with Iraqi Troops" New York Times 10. Andrew J. Bacevich, "Requiem for the Bush Doctrine," Purkitt (ed) [Ben] 4. James Madison, "Checks and Balances," Federalist Papers, 51, Stinebrickner (ed) Issue 2B: Educational pressures (an annual story in early September) [Agenda] Peg Tyre, "The New First Grade: Too Much Too Soon?" Newsweek [Kim B] [PPT]
By Kimberly Barnhart, Fall 2006
Example Story: Ashlyn Aske of Oakland, CABright child, zoned for strong, reputable schoolWhy are Kindergarteners and First-Graders being pushed so hard?
Instantly fell behind in Kindergarten
Homework and pressure too much
Mom investigated and found that other Kindergarteners were struggling as well.Competitive and proud parentsResults of this pressure:
School funding hinges on test scores
President Bush’s “No Child Left Behind” initiative taken out of context.Failure felt at an early age.What Principals and Teachers say:
Too much focus on testing, testing causes anxiety
Curiosity and creativity are inhibited
Politicians calling shots
Arts and Sciences are suffering
Pressure to succeed is now shifting to even younger ages.“Teaching to Test”Solutions
“Too much testing too early…sucks the soul and spirit out of their children.”
So much emphasis on early grades, higher grades are suffering.
Social and emotional development is just as important as ABCs.
Behavioral problems result from frustrated studentsGreat Britain—learned from their mistakes, switched back to basicsConclusion
Chattanooga, TN magnet—slow-down approach. Very successful.Stress and pressure are not conducive to learning
Social and emotional needs must be met
They are just children
A child’s work is through play.Elizabeth Weiss Green, "Taking Measure of the No Child Left Behind Act: (Study: Most support law's goal, but not strategy)," US News [Rodger]
Rodger Armstrong, Fall 2006The author of this article is taking a look at how Americans perceive the effectiveness of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) law. According to a Gallup Poll, fifty eight percent of Americans feel that the five-year-old law has either harmed or had no effect on the school and just over a quarter believe that it has helped. Most people do approve of the goal of trying to raise standardized test scores, but don’t support the methods used by NCLB. Some observers are urging for a more modest reading of the poll. Stating that forty five percent of those questioned had little or not knowledge of the bill and of those who did have knowledge of the bill their opinions were split: forty two percent favorable to forty seven percent unfavorable. Seventy percent of those questioned didn’t think that a single test could provide a fair picture as to whether or not a school needs to improve and eighty one percent felt that the test should cover more than just math and English. Over three quarters of those polled would prefer that each student be measured according to individual improvements.
Some educators are challenging the poll stating that the questions are biased. For example, the question about basing the child’s progress on a single statewide test is not fair because multiple years of testing are calculated into NCLB. Overall, the American people like the principles and goals set by NCLB, but they don’t like some of the features.
1. Has NCLB helped?
* 58% of those Americans polled feel that it has harmed or had no effect
* ¼ of those polled believe it has helped
* Most Americans agree with raising standardized test scores, few support NCLB methods.
2. 45% of those questioned have no knowledge of the bill
3. Those who did have knowledge: 42% were favorable and 47% were unfavorable
4. 70% of respondents felt that a single test did not paint a fair picture of whether a school needed to improve
5. 81% of those polled said
* test should cover more than just math and English
* NCLB should measure a students progress according to individual improvements, not by making one test score the goal for all students
6. Some educators challenge poll’s finding
* State that questions were biased"No Child Left Behind Act," Wikipedia
- "Details Emerge in British Terror Case" New York Times
- 29. Ernest R. May, "When Government Writes History, " Stinebrickner (ed)
- 10. Harold Hongju Koh, "On America’s Double Standard," Stinebrickner (ed) [Kim B] [PPT]
By Kimberly Barnhart, Fall 2006America has a long history of holding themselves to one standard while imposing the rest of the world to a different standard.
- Prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba
- Unsigning the International Criminal Court (ICC)
- Ignoring International adjudicationsHistorically, this has been okay. Double-standards haven’t always been harmful
- United States human rights are particular due to the First Amendment and judicial protection
-America is not being exceptional, but synonymous, i.e. Feet and inches/ metric system.
- Penchant for non-ratification (or ratification with reservation) of international treaties. I.e. International Convention on the Rights of the Child. (hurt US even though it mostly complies with current standards)Double Standards give the world a negative view of the U.S.
- However, US is exceptional in international affairs—global leadership and activism.
- When US leads, other countries follow. When US does not get involved, often nothing happens.Power: Strong military, weak diplomacy efforts
- Afghanistan…went in strong to oust Taliban, but then what?
- IraqBush Administration
- Opted for extra-legal strategy
- American exceptions and double-standards are becoming the “rule”
- Imposed democracy—oxymoron…must come from the will of the people.
- Weakens America’s stance on human-rights, universal values
- Hostile courseWhat do we do about it?
- Use transnational legal process to put forward the best face of American exceptionalism…promotes human rights and the rule of law.
- This process involves public, private, nation states, international organizations to make, interpret, enforce and finally internalize rules of international law.
- Turn the tide—institutions and citizens
- No longer have the option of isolationism.
- Power-based internationalism or norm-based?Conclusion
- America is founded in liberty and inalienable rights.
- Strong impulses to respond to crisis with power and principle.
- What will America’s role be?
- Better angels. (Abe Lincoln)- Lecture Resources: Terrorism index | Essay |
Issue 3A: Public Opinion on National Security, 5 Years After 9/11 Attacks. [Agenda] "Is America Ready? Former 9/11 Commission Co-Chair Lee Hamilton Answers ..." Newsweek, 11 Sep. '06 [Kim T]
By Kimberly Tarver, Fall 2006
A. Five Year Later
* Many Americans wonder if the country is better prepared
* Several Suggestions made to better secure our Country
* Many recommendations have yet to be implemented
B. Who will be held accountable for not implementing recommendations (if/when another attack occurs?
C. How do we improve airport security?
* More Thorough passenger screening
* Improvements on checked bags and cargo security
* Provide funding for Transportation Security Administration
* Install explosive detection trace portals
Mike Allen, "Why Bush's Security Pitch May Not Work This Time." Time, 10 Sep. '06 [Rodger]
Rodger Armstrong, Fall 2006
The author of this article looks at President Bush’s message of Republicans are strong and Democrats are weak. Therefore, the President believes, only the Republicans can keep the country safe. This approach helped the G.O.P avoid losing power in the 2002 midterm elections. It also worked in the President’s re-election bid in 2004; where he campaigned by reminding the voters that the US is at war. The big question for the 2006 elections is will this approach work again? Many of the Republican candidates are doubtful. A few are even distancing themselves from the Presidents game plan. The problem with running the same play over and over is the opposition figures out how to defend against it. Democrats that stayed clear of the topic of national security in the past two elections are now embracing it and appear to have found their voice with the steady insistence that Iraq has been mishandled. It’s not just Iraq that the Democrats are targeting. They are arguing that the result of the President and the Republican-led Congress’ failed policies in Iraq and on the War on Terror is that America is less safe.
1. Republicans2. Democrats
- Republicans are Strong and Democrats are weak, only G.O.P can keep America Safe
- Plans to prosecute some of the world’s most prominent terrorists.
- Reminding the voters that America is at war.
- Declassified letters, videos and audiotapes of top al-Qaeda members talking about Iraq
- Message from bin Laden in which he calls Iraq a “War of destiny between infidelity and Islam”
- Embracing the topic of national Security
- Steady insistence that Iraq has been mishandled.
- Accusing the President and the Republican-led Cbongress that because of its policy in Iraq and the War on Terror, America is less safe.
- Cannot permit themselves to be characterized as being weak on terrorism
Joe Klein, "The Middle is a Bad Place to Be," Time, 10 Sep. '06[Kim B]
Summarized by Kimberly Barnhart
How do we restore some balance to American politics? That question is at the heart of the 2006 congressional election.
* Case Study: Connecticut Congressional Race
* Candidates—Incumbent Christopher Shays (R)
And Diane Farrell (D)
Both moderate and both estimable.
Big difference is Party Affiliation.
* Shays has been a long-time Congressman (19 years).
“Friend of the Family.”
But voters are looking beyond loyalty and more towards balance.
* Is the surest path to political balance that of a divided government—with one party holding the presidency and the other at least one house of Congress?
* Shays and the Republicans enthusiastic support of the war in Iraq have caused supporters to waver in their loyalty.
* Even though Shays has re-vamped his position on Iraq, it is not enough.
* One fellow, even though he likes Shays, he will not vote for him. “If we don’t get some meaningful congressional oversight of the Bush Administration, this country many be gone forever.” (Zinner)
Robin Toner and Marjorie Connelly, "0/11 Polls Find Lingering Fears in New York City," NY Times, 7 Sep. '06 [Della B]
Della Baker, Fall 2006
This article is about statistics on how New Yorkers feel since 9/11 compared to other people in the United States. The New York Times and CBS News conducted the poll. The national poll was conducted by telephone on August 17-21, 2006 with 1,206 adults and the New York City poll was conducted on August 23-27, 2006 with 838 adults. American’s personal sense of security linked to where they live. A third of those in large cities were very concerned while only about 13% in small towns and rural areas felt this way.
* 66% of New Yorkers are still “very concerned” about another attack.
* 1/3 of New Yorkers think about 9/11 every day.
* 1/3 of New Yorkers are still dealing with changes caused by September 11th.
* 22% of national poll still “very concerned” about another attack.
* 72% of New Yorkers think government could do more to protect us from future attacks while only 58% felt this way in national poll.
* Six in ten New Yorkers are not willing to work on a high floor in a new building at World Trade Center site.
* President Bush’s approval rating in October 2001 with New Yorkers was 79% and in the recent poll the approval rating was 25%.
* Americans believe we will always have to live with the threat of terrorism against the United States, which is part of the “new normal”.
* There were large divisions in the poll between Democrats and Republicans on subjects such as protection from another attack where 56% of Republicans feel good about what the government is doing while 66% of Democrats do not feel government is doing a good job in protecting us.
* Women were more likely to feel nervous about the government’s ability to handle another attack than men.
* New Yorkers expressed concern that they did not trust the government to tell them about the dangers of contaminated air or water in the event of another attack. Many have had lasting problems from the air and debris from ground zero.
Linda Robinson, Men on a Mission: U.S. Special Forces are retooling for the war on terror. Here's their plan. US News, Sunday, 3 Sep. '06 [Twillia F]
By: Twillia Fontenot, Fall 2006
* This article describes the plans of Special Forces to retool the war on terror.
* The strategy behind the military’s global counterterrorism plan-OPLAN 7500 includes:o Increasing allies like NATO* The Special Operation Forces or SOF contain black and white forces:
o Broadening the manhunt to a mission that includes training partner nations in counterterrorism, intelligence, civil affairs, and attacking radical Islamismo The black forces include direct action strategies like kicking down doors, killing enemies and rappelling from helicopters.* The principals behind the war on terror are primarily focused on preventive measures.
o The white forces includes indirect action strategies like military training, road-building and medical aid in order to gain popular support and new intelligence.
* Counterterrorism initiatives include:o Encouraging countries to act in their own self-interest without the help of the US.* The Special Operation Force community states that in order fight wars against unconventional warfare that the resource capabilities for equipment, aircraft, intelligence, and other support must be significantly increased for them. At this point direct action is the only capabilities that the SOF primarily can provide.
o The Special Operation Committee is sending military contact elements to countries where the US may possibly be called to deal with terrorists.
* On a positive note, the Special Operation Committee budget for equipment has increased to $2.7B since 9/11, but most of these funds have gone to the white forces and not the black.
* Jim Saxton, the chairman of the special operations committee, states that the key to our military success resides in increasing our unconventional capabilities. However, the Department of Defense is still focused on the direct-action success.
Issue 3B: Psychological issues: Education, Child Development and Torture [Agenda] Charles McGrath, "At 9.95 a Page, You Expected Poetry?"New York Times, Sun. 10 Sep. 2006.[Rodger]
Rodger Armstrong, Fall 2006
In this article, the author looks at term papers for sell on the web; how they are made to order and “completely non-plagiarized”. The author tested three of the internet sites with three English literature papers. The results were dismal. The Professors that were looking at the term papers gave both papers bad grades. One company never sent the requested work.
1. What were the Results of the paper that they ordered2. What were the response of the companies that wrote the papers?
- Ordered three sample English literature papers from three different companies.
- The two papers that were received were poorly organized, awkwardly phrased, thin on substance, padded and stating and restating the obvious.
- Two Professors that looked at the papers said that they would ask the students to either meet with them or give the paper a failing grade.
- One essay was never delivered
- Basically an electronic version of “The dog ate my homework”
- Asked for a 24 hour extension
- One offered a full refund and 10% discount on a new paper.
Nathan Thornburgh, "The Kidnapper's Trick", Time, 10 Sep. '06) [Kim B]
by Kimberly Barnhart
This article discusses the mental and psychological effects on a child is irrevocably poisoned against a parent. This can occur in the case of an abduction where the kidnapper tells the victim that his/her parents did not want them or that the child has been forgotten. More commonly, in the case of a custody dispute, one parent will try to turn the child away from the other parent. This is called “parental alienation syndrome.”• Two case studies on abductions.
• Natascha Kampusch—Austrian child abducted 8 years ago at the age of 10. Recently escaped her captor but had not reunited with her parents just yet. Captor told her that her parents had “simply forgotten about her.”
• Steven Stayner—Californian child abducted at the age of 7. Held captive for seven years, living as the abductor’s son. Abductor told him that his dad had died and his mother gave custody to the abductor.Parental Alienation Syndrome
• One parent accuses the other of brainwashing their child and turning him or her against the parent.
• Brutally effective way to secure child’s allegiance.
• In extreme cases, parents can implant false memories of abuse or stir a child into a permanent and irrational rage against the targeted parent.Treatments
• Reconciliation therapy—look through photo albums to humanize the parent again.
• Show children how easily their minds can be tricked and it’s not their fault.End Results--Counterintuitive
• Natascha has not returned home to her parents. She visits with her mother, but not her father.
• She is angry with her father for speaking for her regarding the death of her captor. Her father said that she would celebrate his death. In fact, she mourned her captor.
• Steven returned to his childhood home, but struggled to fit back in.
• Nine years later, he died in a motorcycle crash.
• It’s a long, hard road to recovering the relationships with the parents.Ron Susskind, "The Unofficial Story of the Al Qaeda 14: Their Torture by the CIA ...", Time, 10 Sep. '06 (see second half)[Cheryl R]
by Cheryl Roy, Fall 2006* Secret prisons and the Interrogators treatment of the al-Qaeda operatives
* Techniques with odd names like “water boarding”.
* CIA’s 14 high-value detainees moved
* Trial will be in the coming months
* Treatment of these detainees, Was it justified? Is it ever? Do you care?
* Remember 9/11 and our nation’s broken heart.
* Afghan fighters moved to Guantanamo in early 2002 and first al-Qaeda operative was picked up.
* Debate on what would produce highest-quality yield from interrogation with greatest speed.
* U.S. intelligence was panicked with fear of 2nd attack.
* FBI interrogation experience in 1990 led to numerous prosecutions of 1st World Trade Center and other bombings.
* FBI Learned al-Qaeda members assumed they would be dismembered.
* FBI presented a human face to detainees and patience was rewarded:Agent’s Knowledge of Koran
Access to unlimited videos
Operation for an al-Qaeda member’s child* CIA wanted to do whatever necessary and President Bush went with CIA’s ways
*----I could leave out everything above (Is this the 2nd half you were talking about-below?)
* President Bush brought Captives out of the darkness of CIA “black site” prisons to get things started legally.Proposal for military tribunal to dispose of them
Harsh interrogation methods are not illegal
16 “old school” ways of interrogation.* Learned from early errors.
March 2002-Abu Zubaydah-experiment in righteous brutality produced very little.
Ramzi Binalshibh provided little info under duress
9/11 planner Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM)-little info.* Bush-creative liberties with information gathered. One capture and info lead to another and another
* Many sources of information led to capture of KSM. Information taken from al-Jazeera reporter-Binalshibh was captured in September 2002.
* KSM guided CIA agent’s to terrorists safe house and collected $25 million reward and was relocated somewhere in the U.S.
* Abusive interrogations of the 14 led to actionable intelligence.
* Unnecessary costs of resorting to abuse
Lost opportunity to gain more information by forming captor-captive relationship
Loss of moral authority
Poisoning of eventual legal proceeding-disallow evidence gained through torture.* Americans are eager to get an unfiltered-read nonpoliticized look at “high value” captives.
* Administration against an authentic legal process.
* Republican Senator’s challenging the President’s narrow tribunal plan.Issue 3C: Leadership Change in British Politics [Agenda]
Issue 4A: Election Campaign '06 [Agenda]
- Adam Nagourney, "In Campaign Ads for Democrats, Bush Is the Star", New York Times, 17 Sep. '06, [print] [page] [Rodger] Rodger Armstrong, Fall 2006
Adam Nagourney is looking at how the Democrats are trying to take advantage of President Bush’s low approval rating (around 40% at time of article), by running ads featuring the President and the Republican candidates. With the Republicans trying to distance themselves from the President and the war in Iraq, the Democrats are using the ads to damn the Republicans by show how many times they have stood with the President. The Democrats want to take advantage of the President poll numbers and low popularity and make this election about a referendum on him; by placing the President and his agenda on the ballot.
* Democrats ads
1. Take advantage of Presidents low poll number
2. Make this election about the President Bush’s agenda
3. To keep the Iraq war this issue, not to let the President make it about the war on terror* Presidents Bush’s\Republicans
1. Low poll number (at time of article around 40%) and his lagging popularity (important note September 19 poll showed the President approval rating rise to 44%)
2. President Bush trying to control the political dialogue by move the de bate away for Iraq
3. Republican’s distancing themselves from President
4. Republican’s trying to associate themselves with John McCain* Risk of running this type of ads
1. President poll numbers on the rise
2. Ads are Jazzing up support for the Republican voters, riling up Republican base voters
3. Democrats must do more than attack the President; they must also offer plans of their own.
- Robert Pear, "The Ad Campaign: Is the Incumbent Too Close to Bush? Or Not Close Enough?", New York Times, 17 Sep. '06, with video box of CT 5th race with Nancy Johnson [print] [page]
- Howard Fineman and Holly Bailey, "The Democratic Entourage: Can Rahm Emanuel deliver the House? Newsweek, 17 Sep. '06. [Della] by Della Baker, Fall 2006
* John Yarmuth who is Democratic candidate for Congress in Louisville, KY is hoping to beat incumbent Anne Northrup who is a Republican. Yarmuth owned a local magazine that published articles that might cause controversy and he is independently wealthy.
* Representative Rahm Emanuel of Chicago holds the key to many Democratic successes. He is a one-man pecking order. Emanuel has studied the Republicans expensive, cutting-edge voter “outreach” program.
* Emanuel’s Red to Blue Program is a Good Housekeeping Seal. “It means a lot of things: campaign well run, campaign well financed, good candidate.”
* Democrats’ hopes of winning control of the House rest on whether real people can be as effective as they have been portrayed as being on TV. A switch of just 15 seats would give the Democrats the advantage in the House of Representatives. As of right now it is still too close to call. The Democrats believe they can pickup 15-19 seats, but it is too early to celebrate a red to blue victory.
* Rahm Emanuel’s brother is Ari Emanuel who is a hotshot Hollywood agent and he is becoming a political networking force in Los Angeles. He represents executive producers, Tompkins and Wahl berg, of the show “Entourage”. One of the characters in “Entourage” is modeled on Ari Emanuel.
* The Republicans have the organizational and financial advantage. Republicans as a whole have $30 million more in the bank than Democrats.
* Rahm Emanuel is a member of the Ways and Means Committee and has teamed up with Chuck Schumer to tap uncharted donor fields in the financial world.
* The entertainment industry is a major source of cash for Democrats. The industry has given about $10 million to Democrats so far.
* Ari Emanuel has sponsored fund-raisers while his brother Rahm is turning attention to get out and vote operations.
- Video ads by Democrats, New York Times
Issue 4B: Islam's relations with the West [Agenda]
- Jeff Israely and Andrew Purvis, "The First Casualty of the Pope's Islam Speech", Time, 15 Sep. '06 [print] [page] Pope's recounting a mediaeval religious debate sets off stormy reactions in Turkey. By Kimberly Tarver, Fall 2006
A. Pope Benedict XIV’s controversial comments
* The Muslims are wrong
* “..you will find things that are evil and inhuman..”B. The Muslims reaction
* A firestorm of criticism from the Muslim world
* Comparing the Pope to Adolph Hitler
* One extremist has order the Pope executed
* The Pope has thrown fuel on a fire in world on the verge of a religious clash.
* many are demanding an apologyC. The Catholics reaction
* The trip to Turkey may be in jeopardy
* Attempt at damage control a little too late
- [text of Pope's remarks] mediaeval quote in middle of discussion of reason in religious dialogue.
Jon Meacham, "A Pope's Holy War", Newsweek, 17 Sep. '06 [page] similar to Time article above. [Kim B] Outline by Kimberly Barnhart, Fall 2006
“By quoting a 14th-century Christian emperor on an ‘evil and inhuman’ Islam, Benedict XVI ignites a global storm. What was he thinking?"
Background
• Lecture at the University of Regensburg in Germany to a group of scientists.
• Most of the address was on faith and reason. But reminisced about “lively discussions” in his days as an academic.
• The Quote: “Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.” Manuel II.
Results
• Pakistani parliament voted to condemn the pope.
• Leading Shiite cleric in Lebanon asked for a personal apology.
• Equated with Hitler and Mussolini in Turkey’s governing party and suggested that the pope reconsider his trip there this fall.
• Two churches in the West Bank were bombed.
Vatican Response
• Issued “Declaration Concerning Pope’s Regensburg Address” stating that the lecture was not intended to be an in depth study of jihad or Muslim ideas on jihad nor was the lecture intended to offend the Muslim faith.
What was he thinking?
• Intentions were good yet clumsy. Wanted to raise the issue of religious extremism that gives rise to terror and violence.
• Lecture discussed religiously inspired violence and the need to see a God of love.
• Benedict different from John Paul. Likes a “hard-headed” conversation about the role of faith in the life of the world. Concerned with a declining Christian vigor in Europe.
• “He knew exactly what he was doing. He is saying that irrational violence is displeasing to God.”
Opinions
• You can’t call Islam irrational without confronting the history of Christianity or Judaism. i.e. Crusades.
• Is Al Qaeda fueled by hate? Yes—more Muslim leaders need to speak out about that. But overall Islam has grown more by proselytizing rather than violence.
Update:
• Pope Benedict XVI said that he is “deeply sorry” about the angry reactions to his remarks, but reminds everyone that it was a quote and not a personal opinion.
Issue 4C: War in Iraq and Possible War with Iran [Agenda]
- Michael Duffy, "What War With Iran Would Look Like", Time 15 Sep. '06 [may have to view an advertising screen to see this, print version] [page] Look for a scenario of the potential war with Iran, including difficulties of bunker busting, counter terrorism, and keeping open oil lanes in straits of Hormuz. [Rodger] By Rodger Armstrong, Fall 2006
This article is look at what a war with Iran might look like. No one really knows if or when this may happen. But the U.S. Military is making plan and running scenarios, most of which will never be put in place. The likely hood that the U.S. will go to war with Iran is very unlikely; but the last thing that the U.S. can afford is not to be prepared. But, the White House is kicking up its efforts to resolve the Iran problem before it starts.
* Road to War
1. Years in the making
2. Acquired pieces, parts and plants needed to make a nuclear devicea) Iranian officials insist that they only are interested in nuclear power
3. Iran has sponsored Terrorist groups in a handful of countries, but is backing Hizballah
b) President of Iran is drumming up support by saying that Iran has a right to a nuclear program
* Would an Attack Work
1. Yes and Noa) Air attack no ground force (Tied up else were)
* What would come next
b) Only attack the nuclear facilities
c) would involve almost every type of aircraft in the U.S. arsenal
1. No one knows; just be prepared for all that would followa) terrorism – Hizballah attack Israel, get them in the war
* Can it be stopped
b) Create mayhem in the two nations on its flank
c) stop oil flow – plant mines choking off the shipping lanes
1. America could accepted Iran as a nuclear power – focus on deterrence
2. risk Iran would become the dominant foreign power
3. could provoke Sunni countries, like Saudi Arabia and Egypt to start nuclear programs of its own
- Sally Donnelly, "Exclusive: The Soldier Who Led the Marine Squad in Haditha", Time, 17 Sep. '06 [print] [page] [Kim B] [Slideshow PPT] Sergeant who led squad accused of rampage against civilians discusses career, but unable to discuss the incident. by Kimberly Barnhart, Fall 2006
This is the first time that Frank Wuterich has spoken to the press, although he cannot discuss what happened in Haditha.
Frank Wuterich is a Marine and also the central suspect in the “notorious massacre of 24 Iraqis.” This article gives a sad and thoughtful look at the man behind the uniform.
• Not a career military guy. Signed up after 9/11 to 1) support his family and 2) see some action.
• Grew up in Meriden, Connecticut. Was in the school band and was an honor student.
• Father of two children with one more on the way,.26 years old.
• Infantry did not interest him, Frank wanted to be in counterintelligence but was denied due to eight tattoos. The tattoos make him too easy to identify.What happened that day?
• November 19, 2005, just two months after arriving in Iraq.
• Wuterich’s squad (Kilo Company) was on patrol in Haditha. Wuterich was the leader of the squad.
• They were hit by an “improvised explosive device that killed one of his men.”
• Iraqi witnesses and other sources say that the squad’s 12 Marines went on a killing rampage.
• 24 Iraqis were killed, including five women and six children.
• Wuterich felt his unit was under attack and acted appropriately under the rules of engagement.Results:
• Six to eight Marines will be charged this next week. Charges may include murder with the death penalty.
• Wuterich was suppose to retire three months ago, but that has been delayed pending the investigation.
• He is officially on duty but does not participate as a full member.
• “Uncomfortable” when he sees members from the Kilo Company.
• Wuterich is detaching himself from the military.
• “I am mystified by a lot of this.”Issue 4D: Corruption in democracies [Agenda]
- Adam Zagorin, "Who's the Next Target in the Abramoff Probe?", Time, 15 Sep. '06 [print] [page version] Look for the scale of investigations nationwide.
Edward Wong and Paul von Zielbauer, "Iraq Stumbling in Bid to Purge Its Rogue Police", New York Times, 17 Sep. '06, print version] [page version] -- may require free registration. Look for the scale of issues in corruption in Iraq. by Twillia Fontenot, Fall 2006
* Progress has been made in implementing a trustworthy and legitimate Ministry of Interior in Iraq. 1500 employees have been fired who committed wrong doing under the previous Shiite-led interior ministry since June. However, the new leaders over the Iraq police lack the political support to purge many of the worst offenders who committed crimes under previous government.
* The new ministry has recently discovered that 1200 policemen have been convicted in previous years for murder, rape, and other violent crimes.
* The police force is still predominately Shiite led and American commanders hope to hire more Sunni Arabs. The Sunni Arabs continue to distrust the police until this balance is established. Efforts were made to move the headquarters of a national police brigade from eastern Baghdad to Dora, which is Sunni dominant, and 300 members quit.
* Accountability is still lacking in controlling police actions. The officers are still abusing and torturing prisoners and secret prisons have been discovered.
* The minister of human rights reported that an order for a mass release of prisoners in June was called for, but the crowding of prisons and lack of access to judges continues to be a problem.
* However, the Iraq police have stopped killing on a rampage in Sunni-dominated areas and the American military estimates a 52 percent decline in daily execution-style killings between July and August.
* Officials stated that the drop has been contributed to the implementation of a new security plan. The Iraq police are being overseen by American trainers in order to change policies in the MOI (Ministry of Interior). Each officer will also be put through a six-week training course in policing and rule of law.
* Mr. Bolani, who is the new leader of the MOI, is pushing to enact a law to ban the ministry’s 167,000 employees from belonging to a political party.
* The Iraq population is comprised of 60% Shiite, 20% Sunni and 20% Kurd.Issue 4E: Rising women [Agenda]
- Newsweek, "Leading the Way", Newsweek 25 Sep. '06 issue [page view, with print button] [Cheryl] by Cheryl Roy, Fall 2006
This article is written about successful women in all walks of life.
Danica Patrick-Race –Car driver-a non traditional woman’s field
* Never had role model
* Strived to be the best
* No parameters on goals-take everything as far as she can
* Prove herself a few more times that a man in racing.
* Rules are the same for women and men. Women can compete with men under the same guidelines.
* Have huge aspirations and never give up.*
* It’s about having determination and being a scrappy fighter who will do anything and hold no mercy.Queen Latifah-Enteratiner
* When you become famous you are no longer anonymous
* Grew in city, where you have no history and you can be whoever you want to be
* Hi-hopper in clubs and basketball player
* The Rapper Latifah-popular and everyone wants to talk to you and get autographs.
* Always have positive attitude and convey that to the public, friends and young women.
* Understand that your attitude, confidence level and self-esteem are the key in all things you want to achieve.
* Promote confidence in women.
* Important for women to reach out to each other.
* Extend ourselves to whom we know are on the same page in terms of moving forward.
* Work on self-esteem and self confidence. That is what helps us connect to other people.Mary Cheney-Political Campaigner
* Campaigning was family endeavor from early age.
* Find what you love and work hard at it.
* Director of Vice-Presidential operations on re-election 2004.
* Not an easy experience
* Best and most rewarding experienceMarissa Mayer-Vice President of Search Products, Google
* Is quantitative, analytical, and data-driven.
* Approachability is important, people want to feel as if they can come talk to youSarah Change-Violinist
* Had enthusiastic parents.
* Swimming lessons, horseback riding, gymnastics, ballet, piano and violin
* Julliard School age 6
* Career at age 8-2 debuts in New York and Philadelphia, recording at 9.
* Travel all over the world.Maria Arraras-Broadcast Journalist
* Grew up in family with passion for excellence.
* Every time you reach a goal, raise the bar and go to next level.
* You he to be either the best or the best of the worst, but never mediocre.
* Let your principles guide youRenee Pera-Infertility Researcher
* Had little interest in science.
* Motivated to have an office and academic life
* PH.D-Biochemistry
* Human Reproductive biologist-balancing career and familyGwen Sykes-Chief Financial Officer, NASA
* Living in large state with small population-developed self-reliant and can-do attitude.
* Roll Walrus, can do anything.
* Not good in math.
* Share with children there are times of failure environment
* Don’t see it as male-dominated, or a woman’s-environment or black environment-only as the world.
* Have the right people to make the right decisions.Joyce Chang-Managing Director, JPMorgan
* Scholarship program for industrious kids with paper routes
* Worked overseas a Chinese woman in Jordan.
* Her generation-Coming out of school to senior management job-big leadership position.
* Today young women –defining success on their own terms. Senior management positions are not fulfilling.
* Balance child care or taking care of parent-it becomes their decision to leave.
* Good leader-someone who can understand when to change directions and when to take a risk.
* Not all about hard work-its about being ahead of the curve
* Being effective communicator.Tracy Reese-Fashion Designer
* Embrace success more and not be afraid to go forward.
* Lead by example. Learn to delegate.
* Knowing how to do all tasks that others are asked to do.
* Everything is about tomorrow.