Huntingdon
College | Political Science |
Courses
| What's New?
PSC
207: Public Administration | PSC
306: Public Organizations
Richard J. Stillman (ed), Public
Administration: Concepts & Cases, 8/e.
Thanks to contributors;
compiled by Dr. Jeremy Lewis
| Revised 23 Oct. 2007
Chapters: | 1 | 2
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
| 11 | 12 | 13 |
14
| 15 | 16 |
-
1: Martin,
"Blast in Centralia No. 5: Mine Disaster No One Stopped." [7e]
-
2: George
Lardner, Jr., "How Kristin Died" [7e]
-
3: Norma Ricucci, "Dr. Helene
Gayle and the AIDS Epidemic"
-
4: Casamayou’s
“The Columbia Accident”
-
5: Susan
Rosegrant, "Wichita Confronts Contamination" [7e]
-
6: William Langewiesche,
"American Ground: Unbuilding World Trade Center." [SPS
notes]
-
7: James P.
Pfiffner, “The Decision to Go to War with Iraq”
-
8: Nagel,
"MOVE Disaster." [7e]
-
9: Susan
Rosegrant, "Shootings at Columbine High School: Law Enforcement Response."
[7e]
-
10: Langewiesche,
"Lessons of ValuJet 592."
-
11: Deborah Sontag, "Who Brought
Bernadine Healy Down?"
-
12: James K. Conant, “Wisconsin’s
Budget Deficit”
-
13: Michael Elliott,
"They Had a Plan." [notes needed]
-
14: Laura Sims, "Reinventing School Lunch."
[SPS notes]
-
15: W. Henry Lambright,
“The Human Genome Project”
-
16: Montjoy & Slaton, The
Case of the Butterfly Ballot
Stillman Chap. 1: Scope & Purpose
1: Martin,
"Blast in Centralia No. 5: Mine Disaster No One Stopped." [7e]
Stillman Chap. 2: Formal Structure
of Bureaucracy.
2: George
Lardner, Jr., "How Kristin Died" [7e]
Stillman Chap. 3: Environment, Ecology
of Public Admin.
3: Case Study, Norma Ricucci, "Dr. Helene
Gayle and the AIDS Epidemic"
Charles U Walters ‘07
Dr. Helene Gayle (explains her life in much detail)
eventually from many of her experiences she used her knowledge to create
an integrated center for HIV, STD, and TB prevention under the Center for
Disease Control focusing on prevention of HIV/AIDS
Close to 800,000 Americans are thought to have
AIDS
Eventually the program became international
The Case Study:
- reframing the issue—common misperception
at one time that only gay white community was infected, yet it has the
greatest impact on populations of color.
- creating partnerships—she has communicated
with many organizations in order to help the movement survive and grow
stronger
- building relationships—stresses the importance
on collaboration between federal government, different communities and
global partners
- politics of public health—interpersonal
skills and technical expertise have proven essential, as a “technocrat”
she assists with formation of public policy
- setting goals and targeting strategies—a
shared vision is pivotal, then you can take steps on reaching the goal,
also engendering a community among staff is critical
- bureaucratic challenges—prioritizing funds,
being and black woman as a director
- leadership—trust and confidence needs to
be built
- managing the bureaucracy—has a large staff
(1400) all are important members, open communication and creativity,
supports open and shared leadership
- lessons learned of effective management
o developing integrative targeted
strategy
o developing broad coalitions
o possessing/demonstrating interpersonal
skills
o exercising political skills
o possessing and exercising technical expertise
o setting a shared vision
o fostering pragmatic instrumentalism
o committing to values
o empowering staff
o taking risks
o exercising management and leadership
Stillman Chap. 4: Political Environment
& Power.
Casamayou’s “The Columbia Accident”
By Sam Mosier, 2007
Space shuttle Columbia disintegrated upon reentry
on February 1, 2003. The disintegration was caused by malfunctions on the
left side of the orbiter due to failure on NASA’s behalf to fix the problem
before reentry.
External Forces
? The problem for NASA was actually
not so much one of being pulled in different direction by rival masters,
but one of how to adapt to new external constraints imposed upon in by
both White House and Congress, that generated new launch pressures.
o After the Challenger accident,
certain reforms had been implemented, but following the Columbia accident
it was revealed that these reforms had all but disappeared.
? In 1992, Daniel S. Goldin became NASA’s Administrator
o Promoted long-term exploration
of Mars and the building of the Intl’ Space station
o Motto: faster, better, cheaper
o Facing budget cuts, NASA avoided personnel
downsizing at the space center and instead targeted the Space Shuttle budget
for cuts that included jobs that dealt with safety inspections of the preflight
reviews.
Internal Launch Pressures
? During the period of drastic personnel
reductions along with unchanged, ever expanding program responsibilities,
and unrelenting internal pressures pushed NASA to meets its launch date
of Node 2 of the space station section, Feb. 19, 2003. This is when the
damage first began.
? The future of NASA’s human space flight
was on the line.
o NASA was on probation due to being
overbudget and behind schedule.
o This explains why shuttle managers ignored
the seriousness of the foam shedding because the shuttle kept coming back
safely.
Two Worlds: Two Perceptions of Risk
? Filming covering Columbia’s liftoff
recorded the foam strike.
o Senior managers did not see serious
risks from the damage. They were more concerned with meeting the flight
schedules.
o NASA, contractor engineers, and photo lab
engineers saw serious risks
? They were prevented from further accessing
the damage before the shuttle returned home.
The Columbia Accident: Déjà vu
All over again?
? In retrospect, this accident could
have been avoided. Early warnings of safety problem that ultimately caused
the accident were repeatedly ignored.
? The big question: whether or not NASA can
learn from this accident to prevent a third accident of this magnitude?
o There must be a long-term commitment
and dedication of political forces outside of NASA to human space exploration
o NASA needs to realistically adjust its
launch schedules according to available resources.
o Effective leadership that nurtures a risk-averse
culture through every level of the organization is essential.
o NASA needs an independent robust safety
organization.
o Create better communication and control
over field offices and reduce the rivalry among intercenter rivalry.
Stillman Chap. 5: Intergovernmental
Relations.
5: Susan
Rosegrant, "Wichita Confronts Contamination" [7e]
Stillman Chap. 6: Internal Dynamics
& informal Group.
6: William Langewiesche,
"American Ground: Unbuilding the World Trade Center." [notes needed]
Stillman Chap. 7: Decisionmakers &
Subsystems.
Case Study 7, James P. Pfiffner, “The
Decision to Go to War with Iraq”
Brady Lamborne, spring 2007
“The president forcefully argued that America
was vulnerable to terrorist attacks and that a hostile regime
in Iraq might be willing to share its weapons of mass destruction
technology with terrorist. So the United States had to act promptly to
prevent such a nightmare.”
“Invading Iraq was coming under considerable
criticism from a group of public figures and defense intellectuals known
as neoconservatives.”
“In 1998 the organization wrote
an open letter to President Clinton arguing that Saddam’s Iraq was
a major threat to the United States as well as a destabilizing force in
the Middle East.”
“After what happened on September 11, 2001
President Bush and part of his administration began considering it immediately.”
“Also George Bush assembled a broad international
coalition to confront Saddam and throw his troops out of Kuwait.”
“On September 17, 2001 President Bush
signed a top-secret plan for the war in Afghanistan that also directed
the Defense Department to plan for a war with Iraq.
President Bush signaled his decision to pursue
war with Iraq in the State of the Union message on January 29, 2002.”
“As the various last-minute peace attempts
failed, President Bush decided to attack. At 8 p.m., March 17, the president
declared that “Saddam Hussein and his sons must leave Iraq in 48 hours”
or the United States would commence military action against them. Two days
later, 130,000 U.S. and British troops began a land invasion of
Iraq and a rush to Baghdad.”
“Prior to the president’s campaign to convince
Congress to grant him authority to attack Iraq, the White House asked
the CIA to prepare a National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq which
was about the potential threat from Iraq that they posed to the
United States.”
“The evidence connecting Saddam Hussein
to Al Qaeda was never solid. Neither the FBI nor the CIA was able
to establish that 9/ll terrorist Mohammad Atta had been in Prague to meet
with an Iraqi official, as the Bush administration had asserted.”
“Another explanation for the administration’s
inaccurate claims about Iraq’s WMD was that the intellectual professionals
of the government were pressured to suit their analyses to the policy
goals of the administration.”
“Disagreements in the international
community and within the American public about the wisdom of war with Iraq
were mirrored in divisions within the U.S.”
Basically on why the United States went to
war with Iraq was because of false pretense of the mass destruction
of weapons that Saddam was said to have in his possession for the purpose
of warfare against the United States.
Stillman Chap. 8: Decisionmaking &
Incremental Choice.
8: Nagel,
"MOVE Disaster." [7e]
Stillman Chap. 9: Communication.
9: Susan
Rosegrant, "Shootings at Columbine High School: Law Enforcement Response."
[7e]
Stillman Chap. 10: Executive Management
& Effectiveness.
Case Study 10: Langwiesche, "The Lessons
of ValuJet 592"
By Sam Mosier, Spring 2007
• May 1996- Fishermen witnessed a twin engine
DC-9 ValuJet plane crash into the Florida Everglades with no apparent signs
of trouble.
• According to Langewiesche there are 3 types
of Accidents…
o Procedural- obvious mistakes with
simple solutions
o Engineered- material failures that were
overseen
o Systems- (The ValueJet type) most elusive.
These types of accidents are science’s illegitimate children, a bastard
born out of confusion that lies within the complex organizations with which
we manage our dangerous technologies.
• The airline system is not only complex and
that safety is never first. Airlines are concerned with making $$. Inevitable
bad little bad choices are made and can snowball.
• SMOKE IN THE COCKPIT
o ValuJet pilots were not unionized
had to pay for their own training. They had low pay.
o ValuJet also used a lot of temp employees
and contractors
o Captain Candalyn Kubeck and Copilot Richard
Hazen were flying ValuJet 592 and had contacted controller Jesse Fisher
about needing an emergency landing due to smoke in the cockpit. Hazen was
directed to take the aircraft not to the closest possible airport but back
to Miami where a better qualified emergency crew would be present.
• THE RECOVERY OPERATION
o Known from start that fire was
the culprit
o National Transportation Safety Board’s
job is to examine important accidents and to issue nonbinding safety recommendations
to industry and government and because the investigators have no regulatory
authority and must rely on persuasion to influence events, it suffers from
“linguistic stiffness”
o The press is NTSB’s effective voice. However,
after the crash there is a tension between the 2 because the press was
rushing for a story and NSTB was being cautious
o Several factors were discovered during
the course of recovery that led to the flights doom
? The jet was old and had a series
of electrical failures that had resisted the attention of a mechanic and
mysteriously fixed itself
? The jet was loaded with potentially dangerous
cargo- chemical oxygen containers
• INFERNO IN THE AIR
o The airplanes own emergency oxygen
system was different than normal. They had been refurbishing old jets thru
outside contracting to update the crafts. Most of the work was done by
temps.
o Recovery of the black boxes showed that
the passengers died in agony.
• THE HUNT FOR BLAME
o It came out that certain inspectors
with the FAA had been worried about ValuJet for some time- it was expanding
too fast and did not have the necessary manpower to accommodate to
this factor
o The FAA only assigned 3 inspectors to the
airline due to other factors including threats of terrorism. It appeared
that the FAA had neglected its duties.
o A shakeup occurred for the airlines, Sabretech
(outside contracted company), and the FAA
• A “NORMAL ACCIDENT”
o According to Charles Perrow, if
the system is large the possible combinations of failures are practically
infinite.
• GIVING UP ON A ZERO ACCIDENT FUTURE
o In order to keep such catastrophes
from happening in the future we might need to consider the possibility
of reregulation- a return to the old system of limited competition, union
work forces, higher salaries, and expensive tickets
o Another approach is operational oversight
in which the government would have detailed oversight of all the technical
aspects of flight
o FAA- need to stop be so buddy-buddy with
allies in the airline industry and need to try to enforce current regulations
and even create new regulations by listening to lower level employees.
o It is necessary for the truth to be told
and paperwork done right.
Stillman Chap. 11: Personnel Motivation
& Culture.
Deborah Sontag, Case 11: Who Brought
Bernadine Healy Down?
Jonathan Lyons, Spring 2007
-Dr. Bernadine Healy, 57, former President
of the Red Cross, a former cardiologist and aspiring politician. A former
Harvard medical school graduate and mother of two
-The Red Cross, founded by Clara Barton
in 1881, generates 3 billion in revenues a year as a quasi-government bureaucracy.
Though successful, it is a difficult institution to lead. The leader must
be a strong bureaucratic manager and also strive to be a people-oriented
leader. The leader must also answer to the President and a 50+ strong board
of governors (officials), seven of which are senior government officials.
-Since 1989 there have been three leaders
and four interim leaders, including Elizabeth Dole, who Healy succeeded.
Healy faced serious pressure over a slow response to the terrorist attacks
on the Pentagon and the dismissal of two women who operated the Disaster
Operations Center (DOC), the Virginia-based command center for disasters.
-Healy’s hard-charging style was effective
yet made many Red Cross governors uncomfortable. When Healy uncovered
significant fraud in one of her Jersey City, N.J. chapters, she turned
it over to the local prosecutor’s office, which indicted the director and
bookkeeper of the chapter on charges of stealing 1,000,000 in funds from
the Red Cross. Instead of praising Healy, several board members criticized
her for being “too tough” in Jersey City.
-The Red Cross provides 45% of the national
blood supply. Healy hired several high-profile executives to oversee the
process of upgrading blood collection, testing and processing, which had
come under fire by the F.D.A. prior to her hire
-Healy saw 9/11 as an extraordinary
disaster in a class of its own, so she set up a Liberty Fund, with a team
of 800 outside auditors. This did not sit well with the board of
directors, who believed the Red Cross’s commitment to equity for all victims
was violated by creating the fund. Though the governors endorsed the Liberty
Fund, they would not forget the fact she created it
-Healy also stumbled with her attempt
to include Israel’s Red Shield of David, called Magen David Adom (M.D.A.)
in the international federation of Red Cross & Red Crescent societies.
Two months after assuming command in September 1999, she made a speech
to international officials chastising them for the inequity of the exclusion
of M.D.A. and how the American Red Cross will “make inclusion happen now”.
When her vision started to lose steam, the American Red Cross board was
persuaded to withhold $4.5 million in annual dues to the international
federation, 25% of the federation headquarters’ budget.
-Many board members disliked Healy’s
strong political stance, as another of the Red Cross credos was neutrality.
After a governor’s vote on the confidence in Healy’s leadership went 6
in favor of Healy and 27 against her on October 23rd, Healy publicly announced
her resignation three days later
Stillman Chap. 12: Public Budgeting.
Stillman Case 12: James K. Conant, “Wisconsin’s
Budget Deficit”
By Brandon Shrout, Spring 2007
Introduction
-
-In the wake of the dot-com industry’s collapse,
the steep stock market drop, the rise of the dollar against foreign currencies,
increased unemployment, and other economic factors, March 2001 officially
began a nationwide recession that triggered budget problems in at least
forty-five states.
-
-The 2001 recession was the fourth recession
in 30 years. After past recessions budget experts recommended establishing
a “rainy-day fund” (saving funds during boom times in order to cushion
the shocks of economic busts). Wisconsin established the fund but
never put money into it.
-
-During the 1990-1991 recession Wisconsin’s fiscal
stress was ranked the lowest among the 50 states. During the 2001
recession Wisconsin was among the states that were experiencing the highest
levels of fiscal stress.
-
-This stress was due to both structural and cyclical
causes.
Wisconsin’s Budget and Balanced Budget Requirements
-Wisconsin’s biennial budget is passed in odd-numbered
years.
-During even-numbered years the legislature holds
a “budget review” or “budget adjustment” to make adjustments if necessary.
-Wisconsin’s General Fund budget must be balanced
each year. This requirement is contained in state statutes, rather
than in the state’s constitution.
-Wisconsin’s constitution allows the state to
run a deficit in a given year, as long as a tax is levied “for the ensuing
year, sufficient, with other sources of income, to pay the deficiency as
well as the estimated expenses of the ensuing year.”
Coping with Fiscal Stress: The FY 2001-2003
Budget (Act 16)
-
-In formulating the 2001-2003 budget legislators
had to deal with a budget gap that had both cyclical and structural causes.
-
-Governor McCallum was against income and sales
tax increases to address the state’s budget problems, and legislators didn’t
question this.
-
-The size of the budget problem continued to
grow despite remedies that were attempted.
-
-The Rainy Day fund existed in name only (there
was no money in it).
-
-Because Republicans controlled the governorship
and the Assembly and Democrats controlled the Senate, partisan differences
contributed to the conflict.
-
-In order to cope with the deficit they borrowed
heavily from the state’s future Tobacco fund revenues.
A Growing Deficit, the “Budget Reform” Bill,
and Act 109
-
-Seven months after Act 16, the Budget Reform
Act, Act 109, was signed into law on July 26, 2002. The bill was
designed to address a $1.1 billion deficit, rather than the $1.3 billion
figure that Governor McCallum reported in his “Budget Reform Summary”.
-
-Even the most optimistic forecasts in July of
2002 showed an estimated deficit for FY 2003-2005 of at least $1.3 billion,
unless taxes were raised or additional cuts in spending were made.
Structural Factors: Expenditure Decisions
-
-Republican governor Tommy Thompson and the state
legislators increased spending and cut taxes.
-
-Statutory provisions included in the 1994 budget
adjustment bill (Act 437) required that state support to K-12 be increased
from 48.4 percent to 66.6 percent by fiscal year 1996-1997. State
aid to K-12 schools was already the state’s largest expenditure of General
Purpose Revenue, costing approximately $2.2 billion.
-
-In 1994 Democrats proposed cutting the costs
of K-12 schools from property tax. Thompson in his reelection campaign
promised to dramatically increase state aid for K-12 schools without raising
state general taxes.
Structural Factors: Tax Cuts
-
-In FY 1999-2000 the main source of the lost
tax revenue was a sales tax rebate of $654.6 million.
-
-There were differences of opinion about the
appropriate size of a one-time tax rebate, along with debates about whether
the rebate should be paid as an income or sales tax rebate. There
was no opposition that was reported to the tax cuts.
-
-Main reason for these thoughts stemmed from
“Fiscal Brinkmanship” (revenue should be cut during good times and expenditures
cut during recessions.
Cyclical Factors
-
-Wisconsin’s economy has traditionally been based
on the sale of machinery and electrical equipment overseas. European
and some of the Far East economies were growing slowly or were in a recession
before the U.S.
Remedies Proposed and Implemented
-
-During a deficit lawmakers have four options.
-
-They can raise taxes, cut spending, employ a
combination of both, or employ a method of “creative bookkeeping”.
-
-The required spending cuts might have been reduced
if the lawmakers could have drawn from a Rainy Day Fund.
-
-The other option was to tap into the tobacco
settlement money that the state was supposed to get over a 30 year period,
the lawmakers decided to draw heavily from this fund.
Remedies
-
-Act 16, the 2001-2003 biennial budget bill was
passed in August of 2001 contained five major initiatives.
-
-5 percent cuts to state agency budgets
-
-delays in staffing new prisons
-
-use the proceeds from the sale of tobacco
settlement agreement revenue bonds
-
-reallocation of federal transfer revenues
to support state medical assistance
-
funding
-
-“extraordinary accounting devices…employed
to ensure a positive budget
-
balance
-
-“High-priority programs” were exempt from budget
reductions (these included assistance to the poor, disabled, and the elderly,
funding of K-12 schools, medical assistance, the court system, and public
defenders).
-
-Three largest elements that remained to tax
were the University of Wisconsin System, Shared Revenue Fund, and corrections.
Consequences
-
-Groups that were helped by these tax breaks
were anti-tax elements of the business community and upper-income individuals.
Tax increases would have most likely come at this group’s expense.
-
-Also helped were members of the educational
community (local school board members, administrators, and teachers), because
K-12 schools didn’t lose funding.
-
-Negative consequences, include the University
of Wisconsin announced a halt on undergraduate admissions.
-
-There were problems among state and local relations.
-
-The state received $1.3 billion out of the $5.4
billion that they would have received if they had waited over the 30 year
period.
-
-There was a significant drop in the state’s
bond rating which would raise the cost of state borrowing.
-
-There was also a feeling of shock, disbelief,
and even betrayal from some of the state citizens, because the state was
trying to return the surplus back to the taxpayers and only a few months
later the state was in a financial crisis.
Stillman Chap. 13: Implementation.
Case 13: Michael
Elliott, "They Had a Plan." [notes needed]
Stillman Chap. 14: Politics & Admin
-- Issue Networks.
Case 14: Laura Sims, "Reinventing School
Lunch." [notes needed]
Stillman Chap. 15: Public Interest
& De-Regulation.
W. Henry Lambright, “The Human Genome
Project”
Charles U. Walters Spring ‘07
In 1998 J. Craig Venter announced he was starting
a private company called Celera that would finish the sequencing of the
human genome within 3 years for $300 million, which was four years ahead
of the publicly funded $3 billion Human Genome Project.
-
(It was taken as a challenge to the government
and the bio-science establishment.)
-
Two years later a draw was announced by both
projects, because both had found the genome could be sequenced in a preliminary
way.
Conception:
-
The HGP was conceptualized between the years
of ‘80-‘86 when the project was coming together with scientists wanting
to sequence the genome.
-
The NIH had to weigh its options as to see if
funding a project would be in its interests, because it was more like data
gathering than research experimentation.
Adoption (86-90):
-
The Department of Energy allocated $5.3million
to initiate a human genome initiative. –long term look at the effects of
radiation spurred it—
-
Formulating a Plan (87)—the DOE established three
genome research centers (in its national labs) one was in the National
Research Council (NRC) which came out with a report in ‘88 that endorsed
the HGP—they developed an incremental plan that would take 10 to 15 years
to complete
-
Getting a Director: The director of NIH took
the NRC report and ran with it, establishing a new Office of H.G. Research
which reported to him—he appointed James Watson director, the most famous
biologist in the world, which brought immediate legitimacy to the program
Initial Implementation (90-93):
-
Watson developed a strategic plan spanning 15
years (rare for the NIH) and an initial plan of 5 years. He declared that
the HGP would start officially in 1990—dismissing the 4 years of DOE effort
and the previous work of NIH.
-
Administrative Strategy: Watson adopted a “center”
strategy where he allowed universities to do much work in their labs under
the goals of HGP. He broadened research to other countries.
-
Conflict at NIH:
-
A feud with Venter and due to new management
in NIH eventually led to Watson’s resignation in disgust (1992)
Maintaining Momentum & Growing (93-98):
-
A new leader, Francis Collins took Watson’s place,
Collins took stock of the company and refused to take the “shotgun alternative”
which would speed up the sequencing of the Genome, but he felt it would
lead to gaps and errors in the “book of life” as the project was called,
still Collins was worried about the slow pace of the project.
-
There were efforts and talks to speed up the
sequencing, eventually Venter challenged the HGP.
-
Clinton eventually encouraged the groups to get
along and they both had a truce until 2001 which was broken over plans
to jointly publish.
The project is largely seen as a governmental
success story.
-
Key points in the project were goals, organization,
political support, the competition which spurred a sense of urgency, and
leadership.
Stillman Chap. 16: Competing Ethical
Obligations.
Robert S. Montjoy and Christa Daryl
Slaton, The Case of the Butterfly Ballot
Charles U. Walters Spring ‘07 (another below)
The butterfly ballot designed by Theresa LePore
for Palm Beach County, FL. had the Gore ticket located second down on the
left side, but in order to vote for the Gore side, you had to punch out
the third hole.
-
Many voters said they accidentally voted
for Buchanan instead of Gore. (statistics proved high voting averages for
Buchanan)
-
LePore was an elected Democrat but over 25 lawsuits
were filed against her for they felt she cost Gore the election by her
design of ballot.
-
She was the target of protests and harassment
despite sample ballots sent out prior to the election.
Is it reasonable to blame one individual?
-
The ballot was designed with appropriate goals
such as making it legible for all voters.
-
Ethics does not require omniscience.
-
What led to voting errors?—the ballot design
(user testing?), voting equipment ($), polling place operations (# of stations,
length of line, poll workers, instructions), voter information and responsibility
(rely on newspapers, direct mailing, instructions in polling places)
What constitutes ethical behavior under
differentiating circumstances?
-
Objective responsibility relies on two
assumptions—certainty and hierarchical control
-
Need for continuous dialogue—no quick fix or
simple answer to complex ethics. All participants of government need to
be in constant dialogue, not just officials but also voters, interest groups,
parties, etc. This dialogue can lead to changes in formal rules and procedures
through the sense of purpose and obligation it brings to the electoral
process.
-
The US election system is complex and few recognize
or understand the multiple actors and responsibilities in the multilayered,
independent system.
-
Subjective responsibility requires individuals
to go beyond formal job definitions and narrow self interest.
-
This essay calls for sustained reflection and
dialogue on the public interest in the electoral process and roles of interdependencies
of the various players in it (few incentives but clear ethical obligation).
Case 16: “Case of the Butterfly Ballot”
By: Brady G. Lamborne, Spring 2007
This is on the case of the butterfly ballot in
which Theresa LePore of Palm Beach County Florida was involved.
-
She had Gore located on the left side second
and if you wanted to vote for Gore you had to punch out the third hole
which caused a huge amount of confusion.
LePore had 25 lawsuits filed against her because
they thought that she had caused Gore to lose the election for the design
of her ballot.
-
She was the target of protests and harassments
despite the sample ballots she had sent out in the mail prior to the election.
-
This ballot was designed because it would be
easier for the voters to understand in the filling out of the ballot.
There are many reasons that led to the errors
in voting: the type of ballot, the voting equipment, the polling place
operations, and voter information and responsibility can lead to a mass
confusion.
-
The voting process is a big task in today’s world
and any change in the process can cause a big problem.
-
The U.S. election system is complex and few recognize
and understand the responsibilities in the system.
-
The government and officials always need to be
in contact with the people with the changes of the rules and procedures
for the purpose of knowing what is going on with the voting process. Also
is to keep down the confusion in the voting process.
-
The ballots in the world today can be strenuous
to the voters and any change in the ballot can cause anger and confusion
with the voters because they want to use the same ballot all the time.
There are a few ways that you can fix this problem
-
One way is that you keep the same ballot.
-
Another way is to inform the voters of any change
in the ballot.