Huntingdon
College:
Political Science | Club
| Club News | Courses
| Maps | Terrorism
Index | What's New?
PSC
303: International Relations
Guest Speakers for Spring
2005.
Prof.
Jeremy Lewis, Revised 20 Feb. 2007.
-
Dr.
Sudha Mohan, of Mumbai, India, Senior
Fulbright Fellow, Columbia University,
"Pakistan-India Relations," "Indian Constitution," "Indian Politics", "Role
of Women in India." 26-30 Jan, '05.
[Notes]
-
Chris Carr,
PhD LSE, Air War College, "War Talk in the Caucasus, Tues
29 Mar.
-
Grant Hammond, PhD
Johns Hopkins SAIS, Air War College, "Technology, Globalization and
Non-State Actors: A Revolution in Security Affairs" Thurs
31 Mar '05
-
Wing. Cmdr. Chris Luck,
RAF, Air Command and Staff College, "The US and Europe", T
12 Apr.
-
Col. Steven Wright,
PhD candidate, Tufts U., Air War College, "Communitarian and Cosmopolitan
IR Theory," T 19 Apr.
-
Richard Chambers,
PhD Princeton, Prof., U. Chicago (retired), "16th Century Supower: the
Ottoman Empire of Suleyman the Magnificent,"
week 15, Th 21 April. [MAPS] [Links to Ottoman
Empire Government]
Dr.
Sudha Mohan, of Mumbai, India,Senior Fulbright Fellow, Columbia University,
"Pakistan-India Relations," "Indian Constitution," "Indian Politics", "Role
of Women in India." 26-30 Jan, '05. [Notes]
Chris Carr, PhD, Air War
College, "War Talk in the Caucasus,"
Tues
29 Mar.
PhD,
London School of Economics.
"Christopher Carr joined the AWC in
1998. Previously he was Senior Researcher, Center for Public Policy and
Contemporary Issues, University of Denver. From 1986-8, 1989-93 he was
Distinguished Visiting Professor in the Department of Political Science,
US Air Force Academy. He has written articles on arms transfer policy and
most recently contributed a chapter to Arms Control: Cooperative Security
in a Changing Environment. His current research focuses on human insecurity
in heavily weaponized communities, for which he has received support from
the Institute for National Security Studies, US Air Force. Dr Carr holds
a B.A. from the University of Lancaster, UK and a Ph.D. in International
Relations from the London School of Economics (LSE). His areas of expertise
include sub-state conflict, light weapons proliferation, civil conflict
in Africa, 'Kalashnikov cultures', arms control, international organized
crime." -- from AWC web page.
Summary:
The Causasus, between the Black Sea and Caspian
Sea, is a dangerous and unsettled region comprising the republics of Georgia
and Azerbaijan plus disputed regions of southern Russia, South Odettia
and areas controlled by mountain warlords. There is oil soon to be
exported from Baku to the west via British Petroleum, plus a new democratic
interest in Georgia. The two are in tension. Russian troops
still have bases in Georgia, and the new democracy is in tension with its
neighbors. The US faces therefore a policy tension between supporting
democracy and securing steady supplies of oil from Azerbaijan.
Guest Speaker: Chris Carr, PhD, Air War
College, "WAR TALK IN THE CAUCASUS"
Notes by Alexander Zachos, March 29, 2005
Why would we be in war at the Caucasus?
[MAPS]
It is very plausible that a shooting war will
happen in the Caucasus, Russia being the main enemy.
Russians owned this area of the world.
In Georgia, the Russians have a psychological
tie.
In Armenia, matters are much more complex.
There are many more Armenians in the Diaspora (people living outside the
actual sovereign country.)
Azerbaijan is the odd man out, they are
a Muslim country who identifies with Turkey. They also have oil reserves.
There is a lot of hate in this region of the world based on religion, ethnicity,
etc.
When the Soviet Union broke up, these hatreds
boiled up. There is much hate between Armenia and Azerbaijan.
They had lived together peacefully for hundreds of years.
Mountain people are very different due
to a regional difference, which is the mountain mentality.
1988-Azerbaijan, the local community decided
that the Armenians were going to attack. They started to kill the
Armenians in their own country, it occurred because of frustration.
Most Armenians that were inside Azerbaijan left
the country to other parts of the Caucasus.
Nigorno Karibak is owned by Azerbaijan, but the
people are Armenian.
There was a nasty war between 1992-1994 where
between 30,000 and 50,000 people died. Mainly led by warlords; rape
was used as a weapon.
The Azeries lost, and the Armenians won due to
better leadership. The Azeries talked to the Turks to blockade the
Armenians, thus, the only way that the Armenians can get goods is through
Iran, or Georgia.
Country without young people, trade and hope.
The thing that they have going for them is the Diaspora, who go out to
different parts of the world and send money back.
This is called a remittance economy.
Without this, the Armenians would have no economy.
The Armenian Genocide- Happened in Turkey in
1915, where the Turks were scared of their collapsing empire, and killed
between 800,000 and 2.5 million Armenians in Turkey.
Ther Armenians want the Turks to admit that it
was genocide, then peace discussions can begin.
Oil: The U.S. should be concerned about
the Caucasus because of oil.
The BTC Pipeline will pump 1 million gallons
per day through, it is sweet oil, that doesn’t need to be refined very
much. It will never be more than 3 percent of the world’s oil
Azerbaijan had a civil war, the leader who emerged
was Hadar Alyiev. He is from Nachichevan, he makes a pact with the
British government.
His son is known for losing three million dollars
in one night in a casino, he starts grooming his son into a tough guy,
Ilham succeeded to the crown the year before last. They had fake
elections, Ilham won with 92 percent.
Does oil trump democracy? This is the
U.S.’s question that we must answer.
The Azeries will sell the oil to buy the weapons
to take back over Nigorno Karibak. This is always in the back of
their minds.
There are more Azeries in Iran, than in Azerbaijan,
this has interest for us. There are many more religious radicals
in Iran than in Azerbaijan, this could convert some of the modest Muslims
to radicals.
Azerbaijan has a very corrupt government in Baku,
Armenia is a concern because of the Armenian Diaspora in the US.
Georgia is the real concern for the U.S.
The Russians have a deep feeling for Georgia,
Georgia died badly at the end of the Soviet Union, collapsed into civil
war.
A group of Georgians called the foreign minister
from Russia to get the people and country out of chaos.
Pankrisi Gorge is a harbor for terrorists, 2001
there were members of Al Quaeda, GTEP, to train.Georgians to clear out
the bodyguards.
The Russians in Georgia see Americans to train
the Georgians, to the Russians it looks like we are allying with the Georgian
Sakashvilli government. This is where the threat lies that there
could be a shooting war with Russia.
Sakashvilli is young and in a hurry with less
experience. The things that make someone a good revolutionary doesn't
make them a good peacetime president.
The Georgians will ask the Americans for help
if they should fail for the two provinces inside Georgia against the Russians.
South Assetia, and Abkhazia.
Should Americans defend Sakashvilli and the
Georgians against the Russians?
This is the debate that could lead to war
Ultimate paradox: We might actually get into
a shooting war with Russia now, something that never happened during the
45 year Cold War.
Grant Hammond, PhD, Air War College,
"Technology, Globalization and Non-State Actors: A Revolution in Security
Affairs" Thurs 31 Mar '05.
"Dr. Grant T. Hammond
is Deputy Director of the Center for Strategy and Technology (CSAT) and
Professor of Strategy and International Security at the Air War College
since 1989. Dr. Hammond is a frequent guest lecturer at home and abroad
on defense issues, future conflict, creative thinking, strategy, and airpower.
He was a major participant in two CSAF sponsored studies (SPACECAST
2020 and AF 2025). His publications include
Countertrade,
Offsets and Barter in International Political Economy(1990);
Plowshares
Into Swords: Arms Races in International Politics, 1840-1991 (1993)
and The Mind of War: John Boyd and American Security (2001). He
has published in a number of journals including Aerospace Power Journal,
Defense
and Security Analysis,
Joint Force Quarterly, The Journal
of Conflict Studies,
Washington Quarterly, Small Wars
and Insurgencies, and the
Journal of Innovation and Management
among others. He has contributed numerous book chapters as well. Dr. Hammond
holds an A.B. from Harvard and M.A. and Ph. D. in International Relations
from the School of Advanced International Studies of The Johns Hopkins
University. His major areas of research are the strategic consequence of
technological choice and future conflict." -- from AWC web page
Dr. Grant Hammond, Air War College,
"Technology, Globalization and Non-State Actors: A Revolution in Security
Affairs" [Material has been removed from its temporary position
on web site, as the author continues to develop his drafts for publication.]
Summary:
The future of conflict, with
the development of new generations of high-tech weapons and control systems,
may look very different. Disruption of command and control, and the
long term economics of developing new weapons, may mean adversaries are
mismatched and wars may be very short. Biological, radiological and
electronic weaponry may supersede high explosives. Proliferation
of new tech could on the other hand erode the US hegemony in military force.
Non state actors are of growing importance, and asymetric warfare may continue
to grow in frequency. The goals of war may include destroying the
confidence of a people in its government, hence information warfare may
be increasingly important.
-
How are the strategic landscape,
the nature of politics, the state and the state system all being transformed?
Col. Steven Wright, PhD candidate,
Tufts U., Air War College, "Communitarian and Cosmopolitan IR Theory,"
T
Apr. 19.
"Colonel Stephen E.
“Wilbur” Wright is a Professor of Warfighting, Air War College (AWC), Maxwell
Air Force Base, Alabama. Before this assignment, he was a PhD student at
The Fletcher School, Tufts University in Medford, MA. His operational expertise
includes assignments in both the B-52D/G/H and B-1B, air operations center
experience as the chief air strategist for 8th Air Force, and as a crisis
action director for Air Combat Command (ACC) and division chief for ACC
Director of Operations Information Operations Division. His command tours
include the 9th and 28th Bomb Squadrons at Dyess AFB TX. He earned his
BS at Texas A&M University and was a distinguished graduate of the
Reserve Officer Training Corps. He holds master’s degrees in Industry and
Technology (East Texas State University), National Security and Strategic
Studies (Naval Command and Staff College), and Airspace Studies (School
of Advanced Airspace Studies). He is currently working to complete his
dissertation in International Relations and International Security Studies.
He is a distinguished graduate of Squadron Officer School and a graduate
of the Naval Command and Staff College. In 1997-98, he served as a National
Defense Fellow in the International Security Studies Program, The Fletcher
School, Tufts University. He is a command pilot with over 3,900 flying
hours in the T-37, B-52, and B-1 aircraft." -- from AWC web page
Wright, International
Relations theories, notes [DOC]
[PPT diagram [diagram,
htm]
President W. Bush, National
Security Strategy 2002, PDF
Wright, Communitarian
Theory Notes [DOC]
Wright, Cosmopolitan
Theory Notes [DOC]
Wing. Cmdr. Chris Luck, RAF, MBE, MA,
Air Command and Staff College, "The US and Europe", T 12 Apr.
Wing Cmdr. Luck, currently teaching at the
ACSC, is a Puma medium lift helicopter pilot, and a veteran of several
conflicts since 1981, including the Falklands, the Balkans and both Gulf
wars. [PPT] [HTM
slides]
-
Why and how was the European Union developed?
-
How will the EU develop in the future?
-
What are the influences on US-European Union
relations?
-
Why do tensions seem to exist between the US
and EU?
Richard Chambers, PhD Princeton, Prof.
Emeritus U. Chicago, "16th Century Superpower: the Ottoman Empire of Suleyman
the Magnificent," Th 21 April. [MAPS]
[Ottoman Empire
Government]
(These notes do not include the hard copy
handouts.)
Ottoman Empire
-
Suleyman contemporary of Henry 8.
-
Period dominated by 2 superpowers, Holy Roman
of Hapsburg Charles V in West and Suleyman in East.
-
Inherited at 26, empire golden age, brillliant
military campaigner like his father, till death at 1576(?) empire larger
than western europe.
-
Reached to Vienna, besieged. Admiral Barbarossa
defeated combined Catholic fleets of Europe.
-
Another fleet extended via Red Sea to Sumatra.
Hence Indonesia highest muslim pop today. Tried to drive out Portuguese.
-
Recognized as Caliph of Sunni islam.
-
Gallipoli peninsular first incursion to Europe
1354, moved capital to European side of Dardanelles, eventually to Istanbul.
-
Name was their understanding of Greek "To the
City" of Constantinople.
-
Nearly two centuries of Ottoman rule in europe
-- but some time before entered fully into European diplomatic circle of
Christian Europe.
-
1525 Francis defeated by Hapsburgs, offered Ottomans
fleet Toulon as a naval abase.
-
Charles V encouraged Iran to attack Ottos from
East.
-
Catholic leaders were unable to crush Protestant
reformation in the process.
-
Relentless struggle of Suleyman vs Charles V.
1492 muslims and Jews left Spain for asylum in Ottoman empire.
-
Example of neighbor in Chicago who spoke no English
but Ledino 15 C Spanish, could converse with Hispanics.
-
Converts to islam "Turned Turk."
-
All Ottoman lands called Turkey by europeans
at time.
-
Upper class not really Turkish, all wives were
foreigners, Suleyman's was slavic, probably Polish and corresponded with
Elizabeth I of England.
-
Ottoman language was mixture and Turkish and
others (Usman) very difficult language, symbolized extended family of upper
class.
-
Each part of empire treated as a possession with
separate laws, with only thin layers of administration at top.
-
Victories on land and sea.
-
Ottoman archives one of largest, most never read
by historians, millions of documents.
-
Autonomy for local religions and minorities.
Legal status of minorities lower .
-
Treaties known as capitulations to encourage
trade between Ottoman and Europe.
-
Brilliance and richness of capital and culture.
Revived a ruined city of Istanbul. New construction, new pop 700K,
largest in Europe.
-
Poetry of Bakke, and Suleyman a good poet.
-
Sinon, greatest architect, favorite of Frank
Lloyd Wright., great mosques. Also convents (Takas) and Madrassahs.
Including Baghdad Taka /Madrassah.
-
Caravanserais (camel motels) for traveling merchants,
each one day's drive. Bath houses throughout empire, impressed european
ambassadors. One brought tulip bulbs back to Holland. Cleanest
nation of Europe.
-
Seraglio comes from word palace in Turkish Serai.
-
Outside Behrun guards, doctors (mostly Jewish)
administrators, mil bands (idea spread to Europe) and coffee (also introduced
to Europe).
-
Grand Vizier = PM, in second gate area.
-
Within third court, past third gate, entered
by permission of Sultan to audience chamber -- but ambassadors carried
in without seeing rest of court. After one ambassador tried to stab
Sultan, guards held arms to each visiting ambassador.
-
Ottomans never sent ambassadors in return --
one way diplomacy w/ interpreters (Greeks) in Istanbul. Ottomans
never learned european languages and never sent permanent ambassadors.
-
Kiosks were beautiful small tents in gardens
of palaces.
-
Harem = place of residential court, not the women.
No men allowed except family. Served by white and black units trained
for inner servants.
-
Topcapa palace focal point, most talents artists
and artisans sent, made distinctive designs, esp. tiles & ceramics.
-
Dome of rock in Israel example, plus walls of
Jerusalem old city reconstructed. Carpets and other fabrics splendid,
including silks and satins. Cushions on ledges and pillows were common
furniture. Divan = counsel who sat on bench with cushions.
Ottoman low stool with cushion.
-
Even campaign tents were lined with embroidered
silk.
-
Conclusion -- efficient government, tolerant
rule, vibrant city and arts, broad spread empire, world power of first
order.
-
Foreigners could eat pork and drink booze but
only in private. Should not wear green in public, Islamic color.
Could not build tall houses or
-
ride horses.
-
Taxes paid via priests of own religion.
-
Question time:
-
tolerance never declined officially, and began
to use western law in western areas. Woman more free to divorce.
Rigid law of earl Islam e.g. cutting off hands of thief were dropped in
19C and european standards spread. Medieval islamic law only exists
in Saudi and a few other areas today -- because of Ottomans.
-
Joseph Knossi, Jew got monopoly of E Mediterranean
wine trade, because Muslims not allowed to work with alcohol, became rich,
promoted return ot Jews to Palestine. Safeh became center of Jewish
learning, from tiny village..
-
Jewish ambassador of Suleyman to Venice protected
the Jews there.
-
Armenian genocide occurred under Ottoman empire;
young Arms had Russian support fr separation, declaration independence
in WW1, civil war Armenia - Turkey during WW. Few turks lived there
but more muslims than
-
arms dies there. Turks did not explain
well their side of it and anti turk propaganda post WW1 centered on this.
Top of Page