Chap. 01: Policy Analysis (2002)
Chap. 02: Models of Politics (2000)
Chap. 03: Civil Rights: Elite and Mass Interaction (2000)
Chap. 04: Criminal Justice (2000)
Chap. 05: Health and Welfare (2000)
Chap. 06: Education (2000)
Chap. 07: Environmental Policy (2000)
Chap. 08: Defense Policy
Chap. 09: Economic Policy (2000)
Chap. 10: Tax Policy (2000 -- two versions)
Chap. 11: International Trade and Immigration (2000)
Chap. 12: American Federalism
Chap. 13: Inputs, Outputs -- State Policies
Chap. 14: Policymaking Process (2000)
Chap. 15: Policy Evaluation (2000)
Policy-public policy is whatever government chooses to do or not to
do/ a projected program of goals, values and practices.
-today people expect government to do a great many things for
them
-understanding the causes and consequences of policy decisions
improves our knowledge of society
-policy studies helps us learn about the linkage between social
and economic conditions in society
-policy studies incorporate the ideas and methods of economics,
sociology, anthropology, psycology, history, law and public
administration
-public policy can be studied for political purposes to ensure
that the nation adopts the "right" policies to achieve the "right" goals
-policy analysis is finding out what governments do, why they
do it and what difference, if any it makes
-learning about the consequences of public policy is often referred
to as policy evaluation
policy analysis involves
1. a concern with explanation rather than presumption
2. a rigorous search of the causes and consequences of public policy
3. an effort to develop test general propositions about the causes
and consequences of public policy and to accumulate reliable
findings of general relevance.
-questionable that policy analysis can ever "solve" America's
problems
-policy analysis cannot offer solutions to problems when there
is no general agreement on what the problems are
-it cannot solve value conflicts
-policy analysis is one activity for which there can be no fixed
programs
1. Models of Politics - used to simplify, identify certain aspects, understand and explain policies
A. Institutional Model
Three main propositions:
-Crime fighting strategy is deterrence: to make cost of committing crime greater than benefits
- Strategy focuses on:
1. certainty- crime= costly punishment
2. swiftness- justice must be swift
3. severity- it has to be harsh
- Makes point that juvenile crime is on the rise and attributes it to their lax punishment. He feels as though in the juvenile sector there is an absence of deterrence
- He blames crime rate on:
1. Social Heterogeneity
2. Socialization and Control
3. Irrational Crime
4.Innate Aggression
5. Deterrence vs. Liberty
- Dye makes the point that crime ends up paying off in the criminals eyes.
- Public now expects federal involvement in law enforcement we see this through:
- Development of policies in Criminal Justice is complicated by conflicting values.
Due Process vs. fight crime
- Death Penalty:
- no deterring effect
- falls short because of racial bias and infrequency of use
- as crime gets worse, may become necessary
Marianna
Dye 4 Criminal Justice
-Crime fighting strategy is deterrence: to make cost of committing crime
greater then benefits committing the crime.
-Deterrence Strategy focuses on:
1. certainty- crime= costly punishment
2. swiftness- justice must be swift
3. severity- it has to be harsh
- Author argues that crime is down and that it can be attributed to,
crackdowns, community policing and longer prison sentences.
- Makes point that juvenile crime is on the rise and attributes it to their lax punishment. He feels as though in the juvenile sector that there is an absence of deterrence and this adds to criminal behavior.
- Book argues that American system of justice is not a deterrent because it lacks swiftness, certainty and severity.
-He blames crime rate on:
1. Social Heterogeneity
2. Socialization and Control
3. Irrational Crime
4.Innate Aggression
5. Deterrence vs. Liberty
- Dye makes the point that crime ends up paying off in the criminals eyes.
- Public now expects federal involvement in law enforcement we see this
through:
Law Enforcement Act of 1994
Federal Gun Control Act of 1968
Brady Law
- Books says that development of policies in Criminal Justice is complicated by conflicting values. On one hand we are committed to due process, yet we are also determined to fight crime.(one is a fast process, the other slow)
- He ends by looking at the Death Penalty. He believes it has no deterring
effect and that it falls short because of racial bias and infrequency of
use. Although he still makes the argument that as crime
gets worse more people want to use it.
- Poor are not principal beneficiaries of social welfare. Only 1/6 goes to low incomes.
- Entitlements: gov’t benefits for which Congress has a set criteria-anyone meeting them may receive benefits
- Largest amounts of entitlement spending goes to Social Security, Medicare, and Vet. & Fed. retirement
- Rational approach to social welfare is difficult due to nature and extent of poverty
- SSA of 1935 helps establish a basic framework
- Depression produces realization that poverty is not always individuals fault, from this, comes various types of insurances:
- Health care reform focuses on 2 major problems:
I. Goals of Education
A) Resolve racial conflicts and build an integrated society
B) Inspire patriotism and good citizenship
C) Provide Values
D) Various forms of recreation and entertainment
E) Reduce conflict
F) Basically everything except educate
II. Battling Over the Basics
A. Citizen groups that have an interest in education
1. Parents
2. Taxpayers
3. Employers
B. Public Strongly Support:
1. The 3 "‘r’s"
a. Reading
b. Writing
c. Arithmetic
2. Enforcing minimum standards with testing
3. Testing teachers for mastery of basic skills
C. SAT scores
1. SAT scores where declining due to more students taking the test
2. College Board recentered scores in 1996 to boost scores
3. Now more than 500 students a year make a perfect 1600
D. Global Comparison
E. Nation at Risk
1. 1983 report by National Commission on Excellence in Education (A
Nation at Risk) recommended a back to the basics reform
F. Testing
1. Minimum Competence Testing (MCT)
A. Citizens vs. Professionals
1. Citizens are often pitted against professional educators about education policy
C. Teacher Unions
1. NEA: National Education Association - largest
2. AFT: American Federation of Teachers - small, affiliated with AFL-CIO
D. Voters and Taxpayers
1. Voters that turn out for elections or school referendum votes
2. The larger the voter turnout the less likely a school bill will
be passed
E. School Boards
1. Selected largely from concerned parents and civic leaders
F. Racial and Religious groups
1. Groups like NAACP, National Catholic Education Conference, American
Jewish Congress, etc
2. Have fought battles over segregation, racial issues, prayer and
Bible reading
3. Community- based religious groups fight for return of traditional
moral values
IV. Federal Government Role in Education
A. Traditionally education has been the responsibility of local community,
later it became the responsibility of the state, federal gov’t is just
a spectator
B. State and local taxpayers have always borne 90% of public education
costs
C. Early Federal Aid
1. Started off as land grants and later went to free lunches then to
financial aid
D. ESEA
1. Elementary and Secondary Education Act 1965
2. Single largest fed’l aid to education programs
3. Poverty-impacted schools were principal benefactors
E. Educational Block Grants
1. Reagan administration consolidated all education funds into the
Education Consolidation and Improvement Act in 1981 into single block grants
for states and communities
2. Purpose was to give state and local districts greater discretion
over the use of fed’l educational aid
F. Head Start
1. Most popular federal educational aid program came from LBJ’s war
on poverty
2. Provide special preschool preparation to disadvantaged children
before entering k or 1st grade
3. No conclusive evidence it is effective but politically popular
G. Federal Aid and Educational Quality
1. Educational achievement is dependent on how money is spent, not
how much
V. Educational Reform and Parental Choice
A. Goals 2000
1. Clinton’s policy designed to enhance nat’l educational goals developed
by Bush and state governors
a. Every Child must start school ready to learn
b. High school graduation rate will be increased to at least 90%
c. US students become 1st in world in math and science
d. Every adult American will become literate
e. Every school in the US will be free of drugs and violence and will
offer a disciplined environment cohesive to learning
2. Not clear how they were to be achieved
3. Act specifically denies gov’t control of curriculum, instruction,
and allocation of state and local education
B. Clinton Initiatives
1. Supported Nat’s testing and proposed additional federal funds for
school construction, tax credits and deductions for college tuition
2. Issue of who will set Nat’l standards and how to measure achievement
C. What works?
1. Research shows children do better when schools are seen as an extension
of their families
D. Parental Choice
1. Parental choice is suppose to encourage competition whis in turn
encourages academic advancement
2. Allow parents to make educators give students what they want or
they risk a large loss in enrollment
E. Charter schools
1. Community educational groups sign a charter with their school district
or state authority tp establish their own school
2. Have to show specific student achievement
3. Results unknown b/c have few established schools
F. Magnet Schools
1. Specialized schools in academic areas, or adopted by businesses
etc
2. Have reputation for quality and specialized instruction, recommended
for inner city areas to attract white pupils
G. Privatized Public Schools
1. A private profit-making corporation makes a contract with the school
districts
2. lower cost to school districts
3. Opposed by public school administrators, public school teachers,
and unions
H. Educational Values
1. Vouchers that would be given to parents to spend at any school,
public or prv
2. All public and private schools would compete equally for students
and state education funds would flow to those schools that enrolled more
students
3. Strong Opposition especially by professional school administrators
and state and educational agencies
4. Sat it interrupts educational planning and threatens vitality of
schools
5. Some fear public education will be undermined and divert money from
public schools to private schools
VI. Battle over school financing
A. Inequality among districts
1. Money in schools depends on the amount of economic resources
2. Most money comes from land taxes so schools with little land has
little money
B. Constitutional issue
1. Supreme court says it is not a violation of 14th amendment
2. State courts are making legislators do something about it
VII. Public Policy and Higher Education
A. Public Universities
1. 3/4 of college students go to public colleges or universities
B. Federal Aid
1. State government carries the major burden of higher education
2. Fed government directly assists many college students through grants
and loans
C. Student Assistance
1. Pell Grants
2. Stafford Loans
3. Perkins Loan
4. Work Study
5. Most financial aid is given to middle class students
D. Research money is given to large Universities for scientific research
VIII. Groups in higher education
C. Faculty
D. unions: AAUP-American Association of University Professors and AFT
E. Students - least influential of all groups
IX Reading Writing and Religion
A. Separation of church and state comes from first amendment
B. Does not prohibit adoption of programs that help all children
C. Prayer is unconstitutional in almost all ways
-economic policy is exercised through
fiscal policies: decisions about taxation, spending and deficit levels
monetary policies: money supply and interest rates
-decided by federal spending levels
-fiscal and monetary policies have small changes at existing levels
-goals of economic policy
growth in economic output and standards of living, full and productive
employment of the nations work force and stable prices with low inflation
-this type of policy making is an example of incrementalism because it uses last years spending to decide present years budgeting
-Theories used in this type of policy making:
macroeconomics: tries to explain economic cycles and to prescribe
governmental policies to counter inflation and recession
classical: view market economy as self adjusting mechanism
Keynesian: economic stability product of fluctuations in demands, written into employment act of 1946-promotes "maximum employment production and purchasing power"
- Reagan used Supply side economics - long term growth is more important than short term demand- free market is better equip than government to bring lower prices and supply and demand
- Clinton used Enterprise Economics- government is responsible to stimulate growth- and invest in
- Monetarist Economics- stability can be achieved only by holding
rate of money and economic growth at the same pace
-govn’t spending has grown because of "Uncontrollable benefits" ex:
- Social Security is the largest item in the budget while Medicare
and
Medicaid are the fastest growing
-Burden of Debt ( p. 229) goven’t spends more than it recieves in revenues and this drives up the debt..things that cause this:
- Formal Budgetary Process & Spending Agencies p.234
OMB in the executive office- has key responsibility for budget preparation (president has no formal powers over taxing and spending
house and Senate budget committees- they established the CBO to review presidential budget after submission to congress
Appropriations Act- provides money for spending, nothing can be spent w/o it
Appropriations Committees- used for specific appropriations in both houses
(more in the house than the senate)
Revenue Act-House committee on ways and means and the senate finance
committee work mostly with taxation
Presidential Veto
Continuing Resolutions and "Shutdowns"- any govn’t agency that does not pass an appropriations act may not take money from the treasury and is obligated to shut down continuing resolutions allows a way around this
Introduction
-there is no better illustration of the influence of interest groups in policymaking than nat’al tax policy
-tax laws treat different types of income differently
-unfairness, complexity, & inefficiency of tax laws can be attributed to interest groups
-Tax Reform Act 1986, IGs suffer defeat
Federal Tax System
-total revenues from taxes and fees consistently fail to match total spending by the gov
Individual Income Taxes
- today taxpayers pay more in Social Security taxes than income taxes
Excise and Custom Duties
- progressive tax--high income pay higher percentage of incomes in taxes
- proportionality/flat tax--all income groups pay same rate
- universality--all types of income subject to same rates
Economic Growth
- argues that if taxes were reduced, might increase gov revenue bec/ encourage growth
-Economic Recovery Tax Cut Act of 1981
- Tax Reform Act of 1986--reduction in tax rates in place of tax breaks
-many opponents--industry, real estate, multinational corps, oil & gas, labor unions...
Compromising with Special Interest
-key to overcoming opposition of special interests was to offer a tax rate low enough that most people would be willing to give up deductions and preferences
-bipartisan effort against special interests
Clinton,Deficits, and Taxes
- Clinton win on promise to revive econ
- Clinton propose raising taxes on affluent, elderly, corps, &energy
- Clinton and Reps agree to middle class tax cut in 1997
Tax Reform and the Flat Tax
-National sales tax-- replace federal income tax and get rid of IRS; penalize consumption not production
-IRS--"Simplifying tax laws would not only reduce cost of paying taxes but reassure taxpayer that system is fair..It would reduce the power of the IRS... taxpayers bill of rights might strengthen safeguards against arbitrary actions of IRS
- 1/4 of the world’s total output is sold in a country other that where
is it was made
- US exports 11%--aircraft, computers,-- and imports 12%--automobiles
- Comparative Advantage--what each nation produces best &
shift toward making that
- US corps want lower trade barriers around the world--lower US tariffs
- GATT--General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade--regulate international
trade
- WTO--World Trade Organization--adjudicate trade disputes among
nations
- IMF--International Monetary Fund--facilitate trade by lending
- World Bank--long term loans
- NAFTA--eventual removal of all tariffs between US, Can, and
Mex
- Dumping--sale of foreign goods in US markets at prices lower than
charged in home--Japanese automobiles
- foreign trade lower US wages
- US corps want immigration for cheap labor
- Immigration Act of 1921--max # immigrants accepted each year
- Immigration and Reform Act of 1986/ Simpson-Mazzoli Act---regulate
employers hiring immigrants
- aliens have no Constitutional right to come to US, but once here
that have right to due process and equal protection
- US Supreme Court mandate that state and local gov’t can’t exclude
immigrants from benefits
- Proposition 187
I. How Policies Are Made:
A. creating an issue, dramatizing it, calling attention to it, and pressuring
government to
do something about it are important political tactics, they are tactics
of agenda setting.
B. "nondecision making: occurs when influential individuals or groups
or the political
system itself operates in society.
B. media power:
2. sets the agenda of public discussion
3. Concentrated with a small number of people.
4. Not much diversity in news reporting
2. provide cues to audience on the importance of an issue, personality, or event
3. "Media event" arranged primarily to attract coverage and thus attention
2. influencing attitudes and values toward policy issues.
3. Changing behavior of voters and decision makers
4. Power of tv lies in setting the agenda for decision making
A. policy formulation is the development of policy alternatives dealing
with problems on
the public agenda.
B. The White House: President and the executive branch are expected
to be policy
initiators and Congress the arbitrators
C. Interest groups: formulate their own policy or do so in association
with Congress
members
D. Legislative Staffs: reflect the general view of their bosses, they
research issues,
schedule legislative hearings, line up expert to testify and write
and rewrite bills
E. Think Tanks: policy planning orgs are central in coordinating points
in policymaking;
they bring together corporate and financial institutions, mass media,
government officials, and intellectuals to reach a consensus on what action
should take place.
B. the open, public, stage of policymaking
C. conclude it is a process of bargaining, competition, persuasion and compromise
D. decisions of the policymakers center around means rather than ends of policy
A. makes relatively little difference in the major direction of public policy whether Dem
or Rep dominate the political scene
B. Implementation and Policy making: all the activities designed to carry our the policies
2. much of the actual policymaking occurs within these orgs
E. Bureaucratic Discretion and Policymaking: most bureaucracy is performing routine tasks but they decide how to apply these tasks.
F. Policy Bias of Bureaucrats: personal beliefs inspire bureaucrats to expand powers, functions, and budgets of their agencies
B. Impressionistic: come from interest groups complaints, legislative hearings, media stories, and citizens complaints - stimulate reform
(Marianna Roppolo )
-Policy evaluation is learning about the consequences of public policy
-Policy evaluation research is the objective, systematic, empirical examination of the effects of
policy goals.
Impact of policy is measured through:
2) impact on group other than the target group
3) future
4) direct Costs
5) indirect costs
-Everything pertaining to policy has to be measured both symbolically and tangibly.
- Politics used to be: Who gets what, when and how
- Politics has become: who feels what, when and how
2) site visits
3) comparison with professional standards
4) evaluation of complaints
-comparing what has happened with the policy against what would have happened with out it
-Comparison between areas with the policy to that without the policy
- some believe that experimenting with policy idea is best to do before implementing, but this
beings about some serious questions:
2) People behave differently when they know they are being watched:
how effective is the experiment taking this into account?
3) Small group experiments may produce different results than when
introduced to a larger participating audience.
4)Politics play a role in what is studied and what policies are implemented:
People can interpret findings differently and often times research is politically
motivated.