Huntingdon College | Political Science | Professional index | FOIA | Terrorism.
Jeremy Lewis, "Impact of the W. Bush administration on
official information, privacy and security issues, 2001-04."
A paper for the ALaPSA Conference, Jacksonville, 1 Apr. 2005.
Proposal | Paper | References
Revised 21 Feb. 2005 by Jeremy Lewis, PhD,
Extensive website: http://fs.huntingdon.edu/jlewis/; aliases JeremyLewis.org or political-science.org.


Abstract.

Introduction.
Following Churchill's dictum that truth is the first casualty of war, some have observed that freedom of information (FOI) was the first casualty of the war on terrorism.  This paper will explore various policy changes that impacted official information, privacy, surveillance, searches and seizures, and related matters during the first George W. Bush administration of 2001-2004.  (To avoid confusion with his father's presidency, we shall refer to the son as W. Bush or Bush (43)).  We shall attempt to separate those policy changes which are normal when a republican administration replaces a democratic one, from those brought about in national security eras.

To accomplish this, we need to explore the policy history of open government, and establish the tensions during policy cycles between eras of national security dominance and eras of open government.  Put in terms of party administrations, national security has been more dominant in the postwar republican presidencies of Eisenhower, Nixon, Reagan and both Bushes (more so W. Bush.)  Open government has been more a motif of the democratic administrations of Kennedy, (not so much Johnson), Carter, and Clinton.


National Security Issues during the administration of W. Bush.
The W. Bush administration was characterized initially by unilateralism, rejection of treaties representing multilateral approaches to safeguarding the environment and controlling some types of advanced weapons.  In the first ten months of 2001, it showed less interest than its predecessor in the fight against Al Qaeda (AQ, or "the base") and its leader, Osama Bin Laden (OBL).  Following the September 11 attacks, however, the president found a new voice, new counter terrorist policy, new homeland security bureaucracies, and a new doctrine of preventive war.

The domestic security initiatives included:

Abroad, the security initiatives included:
  • A military and intelligence campaign against AQ, primarily using aerial bombardment plus special forces to lead and support Afghan warlords in fighting and ousting the Taliban regime and the local Al Qaeda forces.
  • A more conventional infantry battle against AQ at Tora Bora in mountainous eastern Afghanistan, which although doing considerable damage to AQ, was less successful in preventing the escape of AQ survivors.
  • Some degree of multilateral cooperation (Comras, 2004) in tracking AQ's financial assets via the United Nations (UN)
  • Extensive increases in appropriations requests for defense, intelligence and security.
  • Symbolic refusals to make public the intelligence budget totals, and apparent reversal of a trend.
  • Apparent de facto reversal of president Ford's executive order (1975) which had symbolically barred political assassinations by the US (though not necessarily those via US allies).
  • Attempts, led by Secretary of State Colin Powell, to secure United Nations support for actions against Iraq.
  • The public use of intelligence material to back claims that Iraq's development of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and connections to terrorist organizations (hosting Al-Zarqawi, possible meetings with AQ, and financial support for the PLO) amounted to a threat to the US.
  • An Anglo-American invasion and occupation of Iraq in 2003-04 by large scale conventional forces, with a coalition of other nations offering minor assistance in battalion or regimental strength.

  • Information and Privacy Issues during the administration of W. Bush.

    Domestic initiatives to reduce processing and releasing public records under the FOIA included:

    This indicates a contrast (Banisar, 2004) with the trend across the world, where fifty countries (including emerging democracies such as Mexico, as well as the UK and Canada) now have adopted freedom of information (or access to information acts) in some form.


    The paper will place domestic changes in official information policy during the current national security and counter-terrorist era, in the context of the historical ebb and flow of information control.