|
Day 1: Monday December
10, 2001.
ASAP '01 page 1
Paul McMasters, Freedom Forum:
Primary means of sharing power in a democracy is free flow of ideas
from people to government and back. Risk now is gloomy info lock
down, constriction of free flow. Some impulses in a crisis must be
heeded - to shut down some flow. Have restricted congressional access
to secrets; Ashcroft memo sends wrong message; congressional cyber sec
info act; DOD warned congress leaders not to share public info with
own constituents; agency web sites reduced info;
Need to reexamine FOI policies in times like these. All sanctioned
by war on terror.
Government surveillance & wiretapping increased while government
info to public reduced. Vulnerable to democracy decay under these
conditions.
Bush approval highest, government confidence highest since 1968; people
tell pollsters they want less info, not more.
On info policy we think of relations, costs of compliance. But
need to think of democracy; law came on heels of red scare, another crisis..
Constitution 1st amendment demands that we keep flow -- free speech and
press otherwise just [uninformed babble].
Free flow gives personal & national sec. Agencies failed
to share info; congressional failed to oversee; public failed to attend
to info because inconvenience.
INfo is not just power, not just currency of conversation but also
is security.
Need to if airports insecure, or vulnerable to biological attack --
only then leaders will act. Absence of info is not absence of danger.
Wee will not forsake our principles because they have rained fire upon
us.
ASAP '01 page 2
Privacy I.
Charlene Thomas IRS, deputy Privacy
advocate.
David Sobel, EPIC, cases
on clipper chip, FBI digital surveillance proposal, ACLU v Reno Telecommunications
decency act.
www.epic.org
Anti Terrorism bill complex and not explained well by media.
USA Patriot Act expands e-surveillance authority, limits judicial review,
blurs law enforcement & intelligence surveillance distinction; extends
transactional surveillance to Internet. Ct supervision reduced --
imp because target has less oversight in e-surveillance. Rolled back
a lot of divisions created in 1970s after Watergate. Pen register
authority: from telephone environment; distinct from wiretap, because cannot
listen to your line with only pen register authority -- just a list of
numbers called or incoming. Easy to obtain, no judicial discretion
if relevance shown; now applies to Internet for routing, addressing and
signaling info. carnivore does the job of collecting this info.
EPIC seeking info on this via FOIA and lawsuit.
FBI says email header is equivalent to phone line # -- but in packet
mode cannot separate this from other info. Thus government gets access
to all ISP traffic not ust headers -- and conducts its own filtering..
Documents show CARNIVORE could collect & archive all unfiltered traffic
to test bed computer. 2000 independent review for DOJ Final Report
showed it can conduct fine tuned searches, it can also record anything
it monitors. May 2000 document says Army wanted it for intrusions
into Army nets. Less oversight because the tech is classified
and documents have SECRET stamps.
Encountering encryption: US v Scarfo. Surreptitious entry to
install key logger system to capture password. LEgal issues: wiretap?
General search? Highly classified, CIPA invoked. Defense of
this organized crime case was denied access to specific details of technique.
What's next? Magic Lantern and covert techniques? CIPA normally limited
to espionage cases, not mafia. Magic is a trojan horse remotely transmitted
to suspects computer without physical entry, and retrieves data remotely.
Wayne Crews director Tech studies, CATO
inst. privacy & spam.
Market has been moving towards greater privacy e.g. in Net commerce;
79% of people on a web site leave as soon as required to give personal
info. Most bus sites have privacy policies -- but people's privacy
interest varies -- some post photos on amihot.com! Do you opt out
or in? Bus wants opt out so can use your info until you opt out.
TiVo can track everything you watch on TV; credit card Cos track all your
purchasing habits. Social Sec # and Drivers Lic # -- routinely used
without outcry. National ID card getting a hearing and tech exists.
Child online privacy protection act to prevent commercial sites -- blocks
young birthdates, but not older birth dates, so relies on honesty of shopper.
For acrtive beeping cell phone as you pass restaurant, industry opting
opt-in legislation. As screens get smaller including cell phones,
how do we put opt-in policy on screen? SUB7 allows another computer
to control our computer.
Witness equips human rights organizations with cams so they can record
government violations. Tech exists to block cookies and spam -- cookie
central, spam filtering sites.. Ekids site now separate from NET,
protected by air gap. Gov Net now proposed by 'richard CLark of Homeland
Sec -- separate for government only, for greater security. Internet
itself is inherently not private. Tech is better than law at protecting
anonymity -- government is fundamentally not in the business of protecting
privacy -- left to bus to do that.
Sobel less optimistic about market approaches, burden on consumer.
ALso, if private Cos have data on you, Government now can get it.
Charlene: Government does have PA protection but private sector
does not.
Patrice McD why are privacy rights of gun owners given special priority?
Sobel - info collected for intelligence purposes without constraints
then repurposed for law enforcement.
Sobel: government under broad definition of business, would have
access to library patron data but not gun owners -- responds to one constituency
more than others. House considered sunset provisions but not for
most imp permissions such as pen register surveillance.
Robert Yates book, crisis in Leviathan, on issues of security in crisis.
Sobel:
Legislative reaction was knee-jerk to separate 11, little check on
existing ability of surveillance.
FTC exporting legal authority to regulate privacy on Net -- but new
Commissioner probably will find does not have existing authority.
ASAP '01 page 4
E-records
Mary Ronan, IRS, ex NARA, moderator
Sarah Cohen, Wash Post, Database editor:
accesses e-foia databases for stories, ex St. Pete Times. Use fed
procurement data system often, Dept. Agriculture meat packing records,
FDA monitoring of clinical trials. Premise: it's other people's jobs
to decide what it public or not. As requester, do not know what is
reasonable database search. Problems of research: database to o big,
too complex, inaccurate, what do you want exactly? But in last ten
years, anything that passed y2k is easy to use. Actually, to copy
is simple, select * into new data from old data.. Redactions always
needed -- but requester can't specify. The redact, After table drop
column home_addr. Easy to issue command but to positively select
fields, must enter field names, much longer process. Like process
with a socument where requester gets whole document minus redactions.
You do need data map or data dic to tell you field contents. Most
requested databases have about 10K records, not too large. A few
are much larger or more antique. Most agencies respond by telling
you to make FOIA request first, instead of giving data dic first so request
can be tailored. From one database they found a field for guns originally
owned by agency, then used in crime -- followed up for a story. If
database is difficult, $300 to a data service makes it understandable.
CS should not simplify database in advance, requester can do that -- just
give whole database.
Mark Greenwood, Ropes & Gray:
1994-, environmental law, info policy on risk assessment, ex EPA Toxics,
"everybody's paid anyway." "E-reporting and Record keeping at EPA."
1998 Government Paperwork Elimination Act, for e-government but voluntary
reporting from Cos, deadline Oct. 2003. Cross Media Reporting rule,
modeled on FDA 1997 rule. But Cos required to keep in software audit
trail of changes, migration of data over time. If voluntary lower
costs -- EPA found not cost effective more most Cos, only 400 would comply
-- but e-records broadly defined as any record that even passed through
a computer - - actually many businesses will have to comply. Excel
cannot do task, so need special software. EPA experience is $1M startup
per facility -- & ripples out to contractors etc., 1.2M facilities,
so $48 Bn upfront cost total!
WHY do it? to get records accepted in Court -- but already accepts
e-data; prevent fraud, but an issue in many cases; longevity but may not
be needed for some perishable data. Cos are poor historians, Government
is better at archiving.
So in name of burden reduction, EPA increased burden on Cos.
Need COTS software.
Gary Bass, OMB Watch: since
1980s, RTKnet access to government databases, esp environmental.
Lack of leadership from OMB across administrations on framework for public
access. Need e.g. unique Identifiers for those dealing with government
so submitters can be cross referenced with law violators. Can't link
to databases via FirstGov. Rider on Appropriations bill set roadblocks,
data quality condition before publish database. OMB has to deal with
this with rule making, as do agencies. New OMB Mark Forman may take
charge. Sen. Lieberman's e-government bill. All pre Sep. 11
- then many web servers taken down.
enormous amounts of info taken down across government webs. Also
at state & local level. Also destroying CD-ROM on surface water
supplies -- not just withholding but destruction.
Attorney General memo on FOIA changes, huge shift. Discretion
against disclosure. Escorts now for public reading rooms. State
Dept. considering Loose Lips ad campaign for secrecy like W.W.II.
No inventory of current changes kept by Government, let alone justification.
OMB watch trying but imperfect list. Our RTK net still offers data
removed from EPA net, now getting hate mail. Did focus groups, decided
RTK must prevail and burden of proof is on withholding. Info before
Sep. 11 was widely cached on Google and mirrored on NGO sites. Benefits
are critical factor -- terrorists could use any info wrongly -- e.g. football
schedule..
Hammitt: cost of redacting data estimates can be very high, prohibitive.
Access often not designed into database.
Cohen: redacting database OK, but redacting images e.g. PDF
is costly.
Some agencies have profit centers, reluctant to give away data.
Costs more trouble in state & local government than Feds..
Bass: EPA data quality improved with public access -- counters
argument that you should not publish data that's inaccurate or incomplete.
ASAP '01 page 6
On The Hill.
Jim Dempsey, CDT
Ex NS Archive. Concerned that many measures having little to
do with Sep. 11 attacks have been packaged as anti terror. Some had
failed as anti drug measures -- need to check how these improve actual
security. 26 Nov. Patriot bill passed -- see CDT.org. Web includes
memos and analyses, very active site. Act does not affect FOIA but
does affect PA databases. Law allows FBI to obtain from FISA business
records authorization without need to mention particular person; see sect
215 -- little discussed in debate; sweeping effects but under the radar.
B3 exemption to FOIA proposed by Reps Davis & Moran & Senators
Kyl & Bennett -- for critical infrastructure info. Environmental
groups particular involved because long running Chemical industry backlash
against environmental info openness. Further exemptions for CIA were
actually proposed for Conference report after both houses -- failed but
shows arrogant use of crisis.
Kevin Goldberg, Cohn & Marks
Critical Info Infrastructure Act: Cohn & Marks reps requesters,
ASNE press.
Official Secrets Act: criminal penalties for classify info; currently
need intent to harm US, eliminated by bill. Broadens. Proponent
Shelby argues info still restricted by relationship to defense, but language
is missing. Bill was in congressional 8 Sep., & derailed by Patrice
& others -- Attorney General did not support this bill and CIA dropped
its support from last year. Did have increased dialog between access
community & Hill. No study of how much leaking actually occurs.
Presidential Executive Order on presidential records act: 12 yr.
release tested by request for 68K pp. on Reagan. Executive Order
allows former presidential to veto request;; plenty of former RR and Bush
staff on current Bush staff. PRA often cited as precedent in FOIA
cases.
Congressional Records Openness Act has been proposed for past 3 yr.,
but not likely to pass.
ASNE drafts policy questions for presidential candidates -- but this
election, neither candidate responded. PRA does have exemption for
classified info. Pentagon papers released by Sup Ct were 47 vols.
Reporter Vanessa Leggett jailed for a long time for refusing to reveal
info from source even though info obtained for grand jury by other means.
Unlike Reno, Ashcroft would not meet with ASNE personally.
Policy is dramatic change from Reno guidelines.
Bill to study privacy policy by commission has been around.
SHould study how to plan databases for FOIA. Needs resources.
Congressional records Act esp issue briefs from CRS avail via Reps
but not open to public.
CII Act would give manufacturers of computers Use immunity on info
about vulnerabilities, if not blanket immunity.
Rep Horn will intro bill to allow state & local officials access
to classified info for local emergency preparedness. Presently nobody
has access to that info once voluntarily submitted.
Y2K legislation for immunity used as precedent for this Davis Act --
BUT it was a disclosure act, not a secrets act.
Idea as openness would led to security increase.
Last year's bill was in Intelligence Authorization bill, now called
OSA or anti leaks bill. Sep. 5 hearing cancelled was about language
that was not really known.
ASAP '01 page 7
Court Records: Why They're Open &
Ought to Be.
Mod: Rebecca Daugherty, Reporters Committee
Ct records open because of 1st amendment, no secret trials, BUT now
people looking to FOIA exemptions & practical obscurity to keep data
private.
Hon. Rudolph Kass, MA Apps Ct
States are behind Feds. Openness common law tradition predates
1st amendment -- English tradition. Closed cts: inquests because
often do not result in charges; misdemeanor cases perhaps should be closed
but local papers often interested. Juvenile cts closed. Custody
cases closed also and controversial, because abusive parents might regain
custody. Depositions closed, lobby conferences, sidebar discussions,
cameras still barred widely.
Examples of press cooperation with judges to keep personal material
out of papers.
"practical obscurity" phrase from Reports' Committee.
WEb ct records -- would level playing fields for small firms that do
not have so many paralegals -- at present requires drive and physical search..
MA Criminal Offense REcords Info has been taken on by newspapers --
who won.
Dick Carelli, Judicial Conference Info
Officer
Cts going electronic for several yr. but expect several yr. more.
Case management systems now online, accepting filings over internet, since
judicial conference committee studied privacy and security issues in event
of online. Judicial Conference is policy making body.
www.privacy.uscourts.gov holds the submissions.
Policy does redact personal data; depends on civil criminal, bankruptcy
cases. Can display only last 4 digits of Soc. sec #. Pacernet
online service (fee paying) still there.
see www.uscourts.gov, click e-access to cts, to CMECF project.
www.Pacer???.gov = net
Carol Melamed, Wash Post General Counsel, looking at MD ct records
to be online.
Why is access to ct records imp for public? States vary -- some
online. MD docket sheets including basic ID of parties and process
stage of case. ID by names, birth, ace, height & weight.
Attorney General proposed to remove public remote access. Caused
uproar. Chief judge appointed committee. But little chance
of case files online. Statutes and sealing orders controversial.
Why open? Cts power checked by tradition openness. Often imp for
historical info on people such as candidates or day care center operators.
Trends and biases can be determined from statistics.
ASAP '01 page 8
Laura Kimberly, ISOO.
Sep. 11 caused restructure of ISOO & Executive Order 12958. Only
12 staff for yr.. Oversee 65 agencies & industry, based on Executive
Order on classification (Clinton) & got appeals authority for classification
review. Also national industrial sec reviewed (contractors) since
1991 by Executive Order from Bush 1. Never given more resources until
FY 2001, 12 new positions. With Clinton Executive Order got more
responsibilities without staff. Role is policy oversight. Review
of Clinton Executive Order at NSC Policy Coordinating Committee for classification
began in Aug.
Declassification now taking a middle seat at least, during budget strictures
declassification not seen as something that supports the war on terrorism.
Executive Order has been an unquestioned success -- 9M pages since 1995,
a treasure trove. ISOO wants auto declassification preserved, not
gutted. Depends on replacement for Garfinkel (21 yr.). retiring
Jan 30th.
Henry McIntyre, DOD,
clears public statements prior to release; several programs but FOIA
is most sensitive; staff often want to be given the actual decision instead
of guidance. FOIA supported but also internal info given to service
members; info will not be classified to protect government from embarrassment
or criticism. Rumsfeld signed up for these principles again.
Initially reforming DOD was kept close-hauled but has given 100 press conferences
and many more from staff. SEc. merely told staff to be careful before
release, since Sep. 11. Since then realization that info could damage
us. One frequent requester organization removed DOD info from its
own web site. Our directorate has not really changed.
DOD new memo to protect lists of names of people working for DOD.
Law 130(b) allows protection of names of personnel overseas -- a (b)(6)
exemption desired for those who don't fit 130(b). Gulf war stories
of families of those serving overseas receiving harassment crank calls
& letters & e-mails.
Tom Blanton NS Archive.
DOD runs really professional op. ISOO in decade of declassification
not only in USA but elsewhere from fall of USSR to WTC. Great mountain
of classification documents had built up by 1989. See AFS.org for
Steve Aftergood's web that removed material hundreds of pages. Attorney
General last week testified any critic was doing work of terrorists.
US Government Identified Noriega as CIA asset when it prosecuted him.
Overrode ban on revealing assets. Recently Bay of Pigs reunion showed
not leaks but bad policy caused failure.. Recent review using hundreds
of staff of declassified documents showed only ones questioned were 1950s
basing of missiles in Italy, e.g..
Ashcroft memo will undermine secrets by crudely calling for interests
in withholding without tying to nat sec. Pre 11 separate Cheney like
Hillary had been developing new energy policy without revealing who was
contributing to policy.
President Bush has just given even Nixon's grandchildren veto over release
of presidential records.
End of Long Telegram by Kennan called fr clinging to own methods --
do not allow ourselves to become like those we are containing.
DOD mail has been held in container trucks since 11 Sep., awaiting irradiation.
Question Time: one new agency has received original classification
authority. ISOO would have to run it by NSC.
Blanton, just lost another case -- litigation doesn't work to correct
classification but don't want to do away with it. Ct did reject Glomar
response but till deferred to exec on decision. Mort Halperin said
you always lose but you always get documents.
Aftergood -- Moynihan Commission Report valuable but recommendations
systematically watered down until even the advisory bd enacted without
people named to advisroy bd. Deutch and Podesta were on board, but
still [foiled]. Did propel Venona intercepts into declassification.
2,00 cases backlog at DOD, hired two contractors to respond to old dog
FOIA requests from 1993-94. NS Archive is good at supplying justification
for release that can persuade boss.
|